Cases 31 - 40 of 126
FINGERS v. CARTER et al
as 2:2022cv00513
Plaintiff:
DEREK D. FINGERS
Defendant:
ROBERT CARTER, JR., ERIC HOLCOMB, JAMES BASINGER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MAFFETT v. WEDDING et al
as 3:2022cv00143
Plaintiff:
WILLIE GENE MAFFETT
Defendant:
DAVE WEDDING, RANDY STOKES, NURSING STAFF and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Charles Benson v. State of Indiana, et al
as 22-2550
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CHARLES A. BENSON
Defendant / Appellee:
STATE OF INDIANA and ERIC HOLCOMB
TRUONG v. HOLCOMB et al
as 1:2022cv01750
Plaintiff:
MAC TRUONG
Defendant:
ERIC HOLCOMB, RODRIC BRAY, TODD HUSTON and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
THE SATANIC TEMPLE v. HOLCOMB et al
as 1:2022cv01859
Plaintiff:
THE SATANIC TEMPLE
Defendant:
ERIC HOLCOMB and TODD ROKITA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
BRADY v. CARTER JR. et al
as 1:2022cv01507
Plaintiff:
NATHAN BRADY
Defendant:
ROBERT E. CARTER JR., DAUSS, DENNIS REAGAL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
UPSHAW v. VANIHEL et al
as 2:2022cv00225
Plaintiff:
JERMAINE UPSHAW
Defendant:
VANIHEL, JERRY SNYDER, PURCEL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WEINSCHENK v. UNITED STATES et al
as 1:2022cv01150
Plaintiff:
CHARLES WEINSCHENK
Defendant:
STATE OF INDIANA, ERIC HOLCOMB, SUZANNE CROUCH and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 2333 Civil Remedies: Anti-Terrorism Act of 1991
RIETEL v. HOLCOMB et al
as 2:2022cv00130
Plaintiff:
LARRY D. RIETEL, JR.
Defendant:
ERIC HOLCOMB, DAVID BULTER, RANDAL TAYLOR and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
JONES, JR. v. HOLCOMB et al
as 1:2022cv00714
Plaintiff:
ANTWAN JONES, JR.
Defendant:
ERIC HOLCOMB, ROBERT E. CARTER, DR. DAUSS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
