Cases 31 - 40 of 488
Evans v. Spadafore
as 5:2023cv10628
Plaintiff:
Angela Evans
Defendant:
Thomas Spadafore
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal
Williams v. Muskegon County 60th District Court et al
as 1:2023cv00189
Plaintiff:
Torrance Leon Williams
Defendant:
Muskegon County 60th District Court, Muskegon County Circuit Court, Michael J. Poulin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Acuna et al v. Pipefitters Local No. 636 Supplemental Unemployment Benefit Trust Fund Plan et al
as 2:2023cv10463
Plaintiff:
ROBERT ACUNA, DANIEL ARMSTRONG, DOUGLAS BARDY and others
Defendant:
PIPEFITTERS LOCAL NO. 636 SUPPLEMENTAL UNEMPLOYMENT BENEFIT TRUST FUND PLAN, Carl Evans, CHRIS FREEMAN and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Evans v. Federal Bureau of Investigations et al
as 2:2023cv10309
Plaintiff:
Shawn Evans
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Investigations, Nancy Pelosi and Joe Biden
Evans v. Corrigan
as 1:2023cv10303
Petitioner:
Marquis Terrell-Lamar Evans
Respondent:
James Corrigan and J. Corrigan
Evans v. Chapman et al
as 4:2023cv10263
Plaintiff:
Alrelio L. Evans
Defendant:
Willie Chapman, Kristopher Steece, Vann and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv10158
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Durr v. Wayne, County of et al
as 2:2023cv10022
Plaintiff:
Keith Laron Durr
Defendant:
Wayne, County of, Warren C. Evans and Kym L. Worthy
Robinson #462832 v. Evans et al
as 1:2022cv01190
Plaintiff:
Isaiah Robinson #462832
Defendant:
Daniel Evans named as d/b/a Daniel Evans, Robert Mendham named as d/b/a Robert Mendham and Robert M. Hayes named as d/b/a Robert M. Hayes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv12346
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
