Cases 31 - 40 of 399
Evans v. Kelly
as 5:2023hc02076
Petitioner:
Kejuan Evans
Respondent:
Lynne B. Kelly
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Evans v. Ishee et al
as 1:2023cv00087
Plaintiff:
George Reynold Evans
Defendant:
Todd Ishee, Kella Phillips, Mike Slagle and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Evans v. United States of America
as 7:2023cv00279
Plaintiff:
Patricia Evans
Defendant:
United States of America
Interested Party:
Torts Branch USDOJ
Joyner v. Evans et al
as 5:2023ct03081
Plaintiff:
Nathaniel Lee Joyner
Defendant:
Dr. Charlotte A. Evans, Captain Turley, Sergeant Riddick and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Inman v. Brunswick County Detention Center et al
as 5:2023ct03071
Plaintiff:
Timothy Inman
Defendant:
Brunswick County Detention Center, Sheriff John Ingram, Captain Mike Fowler and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BREWER v. NORDAN et al
as 1:2023cv00170
Plaintiff:
KENNETH BREWER
Defendant:
HENRY S. NORDAN, TODD E. ISHEE, PRATT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Evans v. United States of America
as 7:2023cv00090
Plaintiff:
Lawrence Evans
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Interested Party:
Torts Branch USDOJ
Evans v. Slagle et al
as 1:2023cv00026
Plaintiff:
George Reynold Evans
Defendant:
Michael Slagle, Eddie M. Buffaloe, Jr. and Todd Ishee
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Joyner v. Turley et al
as 5:2023ct03019
Plaintiff:
Nathaniel L. Joyner and Nathaniel Lee Joyner
Defendant:
Captain Turley, Sergeant Riddick, Daniel Everett and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00008
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 7703 Discrimination - Review of Agency Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
