Cases 31 - 40 of 255
Stein v. R.R. Donnelley & Sons Company et al
as 1:2022cv00903
Plaintiff:
Shiva Stein
Defendant:
R.R. Donnelley & Sons Company, John C. Pope, Irene M. Esteves and others
Ammah v. R. R. Donnelley & Sons Company et al
as 1:2022cv00577
Plaintiff:
Victor Ammah
Defendant:
R. R. Donnelley & Sons Company, John C. Pope, Irene M. Esteves and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2022cv00021
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition
Torres-Rivera v. Berrios-Robles et al
as 3:2021cv01600
Plaintiff:
Jose A Torres-Rivera and Jose Armando Torres-Rivera
Defendant:
Edris Berrios-Robles, Cruz E Estevez, Marisol Rivera and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Carl Robinson v. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, et al
as 21-2832
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CARL ROBINSON
Defendant / Appellee:
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, DISTRICT ATTORNEY LYNNE ABRAHAM, MAYOR MICHAEL NUTTER and others
MACATO v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv52455
Plaintiff:
ESTEVE MACATO
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv04847
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
ESTEVES v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv39368
Plaintiff:
NELSON ESTEVES
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
USA v. Epolito Estevez-Ulloa
as 21-2432
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
EPOLITO ESTEVEZ-ULLOA, A/K/A Polito Esteves, A/K/A Cesar Santiago, A/K/A Victor R. Martinez
ESTEVES v. CAMDEN COUNTY JAIL ADMINISTRATOR et al
as 1:2021cv12796
Defendant:
CAMDEN COUNTY JAIL ADMINISTRATOR and SHERIFF CAMDEN
Plaintiff:
BERNARDINO ESTEVES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
