Cases 31 - 40 of 451
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-1303
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00359
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Randall Sousa v. Circuit Court of Fairfax County
as 23-1020
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RANDALL SOUSA
Defendant / Appellee:
CIRCUIT COURT OF FAIRFAX COUNTY, WILLBERG TEDDY CHAPILLIQUEN, THE HONORABLE DAVID BERNHARDT and others
Guzman v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv01436
Plaintiff:
Nury Guzman
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., Wal-Mart Real Estate Business Trust, Wal-Mart Stores East, LP and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Lodhi v. Bradshaw et al
as 1:2023cv00122
Plaintiff:
Saad Lodhi
Defendant:
Officer Bradshaw, Fairfax County, VA and Fairfax County Police Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation-False Arrest
Lodhi v. Hobson et al
as 1:2023cv00131
Plaintiff:
Saad Usman Lodhi
Defendant:
Kimberly Hobson, Department of Corrections of Virginia, Detective Doug Comfort and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Tort Action
Bullard v. Detention Facility Fairfax County
as 3:2022cv00709
Plaintiff:
Darrell Bullard
Defendant:
Detention Facility Fairfax County
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 22-2011
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv00614
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Interested Party:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1681 Civil Rights Education Amendments Act 1972
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 22-1925
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
