Cases 31 - 40 of 46
Reynolds v. Forte et al
as 5:2015ct03073
Plaintiff:
Joe R. Reynolds
Defendant:
James L. Forte, Anthony Rand, Tracie Fulture and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
EDWARDS v. FORT DIX FCI
as 1:2014cv00922
Plaintiff:
LELAND K. EDWARDS
Defendant:
FORT DIX FCI
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
United States of America v. 3338 Bat Cave Road, Old Fort, McDowell County, North Carolina
as 1:2012cv00223
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
3338 Bat Cave Road, Old Fort, McDowell County, North Carolina
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 841
Lassiter v. John et al
as 5:2011hc02078
Petitioner:
Steve J. Lassiter
Respondent:
Tracy John, Ms. Harris, Ms. Hayward and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Forte v. United States Of America
as 5:2010ct03150
Plaintiff:
Mendesi Forte
Defendant:
United States Of America
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Price et al v. Automobile Protection Corporation et al
as 5:2010cv00112
Plaintiff:
Robert Jonathan Price , Carolyn Price , Marcus Cappelletti and others
Defendant:
Automobile Protection Corporation , Sonic Automotive, Inc. , Fort Mill Ford, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity - Notice of Removal
Hood v. FORT DEARBORN LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
as 1:2010cv00624
Plaintiff:
Michael Hood
Defendant:
FORT DEARBORN LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1132
Forte v. Branker et al
as 5:2009hc02054
Petitioner:
Linwood Earl Forte and Linwood Earl Forte
Respondent:
Gerald Branker and Roy Cooper
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION et al v. FORTE et al
as 1:2009mc00018
Plaintiff:
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION and COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION
Defendant:
JOSEPH S. FORTE and JOSEPH FORTE, L.P.
Securities and Exchange Commission et al v. Forte et al
as 3:2009mc00065
Plaintiff:
Securities and Exchange Commission and Commodity Futures Trading Commission
Defendant:
Joseph S. Forte and Joseph Forte, L.P.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
