Cases 31 - 40 of 60
Arthur Matthews El v. Harold Clarke
as 14-6959
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ARTHUR RICHARD MATTHEWS EL, a/k/a Arthur Richard Matthews, Jr.
Defendant - Appellee:
HAROLD CLARKE, Director of Virginia Department of Corrections, A. DAVID ROBINSON, Eastern Regional Director, RENEE WOODSON, Eastern Regional Ombudsman, Human Rights Advocate and others
Howell v. Williams et al
as 9:2014cv80440
Plaintiff:
Roderick Kelvin Howell, Jr.
Defendant:
Brenda M. Williams, D.L. Stine, Gary and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wilson v. Rebeau et al
as 3:2013cv00119
Plaintiff:
Eugene Wilson
Defendant:
Amy Rebeau, Goose Creek Health Care, G.E.O. Group and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. G.E.O. Group Inc., et al
as 1:2013cv00591
Plaintiff:
Jesse Johnson
Defendant:
Joe D. Driver, Tami Anding and G.E.O. Group Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Horton et al
as 4:2013cv00010
Plaintiff:
Randy C. Williams
Defendant:
Vince Horton, B. Grimes, G.E.O. Group, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lopez v. G.E.O. Group Inc., et al.
as 2:2012cv00830
Plaintiff:
David J. Lopez
Defendant:
G.E.O. Group Inc and B. Gania
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ardron v. G.E.O. Group Inc. et al
as 4:2012cv00203
Plaintiff:
Joseph Wayne Ardron
Defendant:
G.E.O. Group Inc., Victor Robinson, R. Lewis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Horton et al
as 3:2013cv00958
Plaintiff:
Gentry Tre-maine Smith
Defendant:
V. Horton , G.E.O. Group, Inc. , Bart Grimes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Horton et al
as 4:2012cv00057
Plaintiff:
Gentry Tre-maine Smith
Defendant:
V. Horton, EMCF/G.E.O. Group, Inc., Bart Grimes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Winding v. Jackson et al
as 4:2012cv00014
Plaintiff:
James Winding
Defendant:
R. Jackson, V. Horton, E. L. Sparkman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
