Cases 31 - 40 of 55
David Rodriguez v. William Stephens, Director
as 14-51050
Petitioner - Appellant:
DAVID GEORGE RODRIGUEZ
Respondent - Appellee:
WILLIAM STEPHENS, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION
Rodriguez v. Stephens
as 4:2014cv01444
Petitioner:
David George Rodriguez
Respondent:
William Stephens
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Rodriguez v. Stephens
as 5:2014cv00355
Notice Only Party:
Laura Haney
Petitioner:
David George Rodriguez
Respondent:
William Stephens
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2014cv00450
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2013cv00276
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2013cv01819
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
BADIA et al v. HOME DELIVERY LINK, INC.
as 2:2012cv06920
Plaintiff:
HENRY BADIA , ALVIN BRANCH , JAMIE DELCID and others
Defendant:
HOME DELIVERY LINK, INC. and MACY'S, INC.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Jorge Sanchez v. Eric Holder, Jr.
as 12-73265
Petitioner:
JORGE RICARDO SANCHEZ, AKA George Rodriguez, AKA George Sanchez, AKA George Rick Sanchez
Respondent:
ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General
Josephat Henry, et al v. St. Croix Alumina, et al
as 12-1845
Plaintiff - Appellee:
MARTHA ACOSTA, SYLVIA BROWNE, NEFTALI CAMACHO and others
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LEE J. ROHN
Defendant - Appellee:
ST CROIX ALUMINA, ALCOA INC and GLENCORE LTD
Josephat Henry, et al v. S.t Croix Alumina, et al
as 12-1844
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOSEPHAT HENRY, SYLVIA BROWNE, MAUDE DREW and others
Defendant - Appellee:
ST CROIX ALUMINA, ALOCA INC and GLENCORE LTD
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
