Cases 31 - 40 of 904
Goldsmith v. Syracuse University
as 5:2023cv01582
Plaintiff:
Benjamin Goldsmith
Defendant:
Syracuse University
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Breach of Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv02382
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Employment Discrimination
Thomas Davis v. Brooks Goldsmith
as 23-7214
Plaintiff / Appellant:
REV. THOMAS LOUIS DAVIS
Defendant / Appellee:
BROOKS P. GOLDSMITH, Judge of Circuits Courts/Retired, RACHEL DEANGELIS, Asst. Solicitor/State Prosecutor, CHRISTIAN D. ANDERSON, Beaufort County Sheriff Dept. and others
Bartole v. Goldsmith
as 2:2023cv00407
Plaintiff:
Marcus T. Bartole
Defendant:
Bob Goldsmith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sand et al v. County Of Monterey et al
as 5:2023cv05805
Plaintiff:
Eric Sand and Patricia Sand
Defendant:
County Of Monterey, Steven Bernal, Commander James Bass and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv02011
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Walter Moffett v. Michael Dittman, et al
as 23-2985
Plaintiff / Appellant:
WALTER J.D. MOFFETT
Defendant / Appellee:
MICHAEL DITTMAN, BRANDON BORTZ, RUSSELL GOLDSMITH and others
Goldsmith v. Garrett et al
as 1:2023cv14429
Plaintiff:
Robert W Goldsmith
Defendant:
James Garrett, S. Magee, Illinois Prisoner Review Board and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
GOLDSMITH v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv23276
Plaintiff:
PAUL GOLDSMITH
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
USA v. Goldsmith
as 23-30818
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Demetri Goldsmith
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
