Cases 31 - 40 of 12,940
Gomez v. Garza
as 24-40271
Plaintiff:
Adam M. Gomez, Jr.
Defendant:
Eric Garza, Cameron County Sheriff, Robert Gracia, Cameron County Chief Deputy Sheriff, Cameron County and others
Gomez v. Yazoo City USP
as 5:2024cv00600
Petitioner:
Alberto Gomez
Respondent:
Yazoo City USP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
(SS) Gomez v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2024cv00678
Plaintiff:
Adelaido Gomez
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 402 Social Security Benefits
Gomez Mireles v. ProStaffing Services, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv04841
Plaintiff:
Eva Gomez Mireles
Defendant:
ProStaffing Services, Inc. and Ryder System, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Montalvo-Rivera, et al. v. Garland
as 24-3649
Petitioner:
ADA NOEMI MONTALVO-RIVERA and BYRON ARTURO GOMEZ-MONTALVO
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
HSBC Bank USA National Association v. Burgos et al
as 1:2024cv22241
Defendant:
Juan Gomez, Unknown Spouse of Juan Gomez, Rafael Burgos and others
Plaintiff:
HSBC Bank USA National Association
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1443 cv Notice of Removal - Civil Rights Cases
(PC) Herrera v. Lynch et al
as 2:2024cv01660
Petitioner:
Anthony M. Herrera
Defendant:
Jeff Lynch, Atkins and Gomez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gomez et al v. Monsanto Company et al
as 3:2024cv03495
Plaintiff:
Richard Gomez and Maritza Cosano-Gomez
Defendant:
Monsanto Company and Margate Blvd. Hardware Store, Inc.
Rutherford v. Steadman et al
as 3:2024cv01023
Plaintiff:
Nicholas Jovon Rutherford
Defendant:
S. Steadman, P. Wingo, B. Gomez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
GOMEZ v. DUNOVANT et al
as 3:2024cv00048
Plaintiff:
GAREY C GOMEZ
Defendant:
MARIE DUNOVANT and SOUTHERN CLASSIC REALTY OF GEORGIA LLC
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501 Copyright Infringement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
