Cases 31 - 40 of 964
BURNETT v. REAGLE et al
as 1:2023cv01421
Plaintiff:
DARYL KEITH BURNETT, JR.
Defendant:
DENNIS REAGLE, REAGLE, ERIC HOLCOMB and others
Not Classified By Court:
GREGORY LAKER, CONNER DICKERSON and MARK SNIDERMAN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
KNOUFF v. CENTURIAN HEALTH et al
as 1:2023cv01387
Plaintiff:
GREGORY A. KNOUFF
Defendant:
CENTURIAN HEALTH and G.E.O. GROUP
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wilder v. Harris
as 1:2023cv00328
Plaintiff:
Gregory Wilder
Defendant:
Pam Harris
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
WILDER v. HARRIS
as 1:2023cv01251
Plaintiff:
GREGORY WILDER
Defendant:
PAM HARRIS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Pacheco v. Hershberger et al
as 1:2023cv00267
Plaintiff:
Ivan Pacheco
Defendant:
Troy Hershberger, Galperin and Jordan Gregory
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
PARKS et al v. CITY OF LAWRENCE et al
as 1:2023cv01060
Plaintiff:
NAZIRE PARKS, GREGORY PARKS, MONIQUE NELSON and others
Defendant:
INDIANA CITY OF LAWRENCE, LAWRENCE POLICE DEPARTMENT, JEFFREY GRAY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv01047
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv00046
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv01016
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DALLAL-RAWHI v. FELIX et al
as 1:2023cv01004
Plaintiff:
FARHA DALLAL-RAWHI and FARHA, DALLAL-RAWHI DBA DALLAL RAWHI FARHA
Defendant:
PAUL A. FELIX, ANJUM AVA, DONALD LEE BUCKINGHAM and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
