Cases 31 - 40 of 179
Trong H. Nguyen v. Mary Vu
as 8:2021cv01050
Defendant:
Mary Vu and Does 1 through 10, inclusive
Plaintiff:
Trong H. Nguyen
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv00736
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2021cv05415
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv02088
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329
NGUYEN v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv17056
Defendant:
3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY H NGUYEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
United States v. Nguyen
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 20-3217
Defendant / Appellant:
PHOUC H. NGUYEN
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2020cv00241
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Wade v. Alsup et al
as 4:2020cv06694
Defendant:
Judge Richard R. Clifton, Judge Elizabeth D. Laporte, Judge Richard Seeborg and others
Plaintiff:
E.K. Wade
Cause Of Action: 48 U.S.C. § 1985
Wade v. Alsup et al
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 3:2020mc80167
Defendant:
U.S. District Judge William H. Alsup, 9th Circuit Judge Johnnie B. Rawlinson, 9th Circuit Judge Richard R. Clifton and others
Plaintiff:
E.K. Wade
Nguyen et al v. Nationstar Mortgage LLC
as 3:2020cv06204
Plaintiff:
Sally H. Nguyen and Trung Q. Nguyen
Defendant:
Nationstar Mortgage L.L.C. doing business as Mr. Cooper
Counter Claimant:
Nationstar Mortgage L.L.C.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.