Cases 31 - 40 of 93
DEW et al v. E.I. DU PONT DE NEMOURS AND COMPANY, a business entity form unknown et al
as 7:2018cv00030
Plaintiff:
DUANE EDWARD EATON, RANDY THOMPSON, THOMAS ROLAND SEALS and others
Defendant:
THE CHEMOURS COMPANY, a Delaware corporation, E.I. DU PONT DE NEMOURS AND COMPANY, a business entity form unknown and THE CHEMOURS COMPANY FC, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Dew et al v. E.I. duPont de Nemours & Company, et al
as 5:2018cv00073
Plaintiff:
Duane Edward Eaton, Randy Thompson, Thomas Roland Seals and others
Defendant:
E.I. Dupont De Nemours & Company, The Chemours Company and The Chemours Company FC, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
McLaurin v. Hardy et al
as 5:2018ct03016
Plaintiff:
Broderick McLaurin
Defendant:
Wendy Hardy, Michael Reed, Steven Averette and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lewis v. Spellings et al
as 4:2017cv00074
Plaintiff:
Travis Earl Lewis
Defendant:
Margaret M.L. Spellings, W Louis Bissette, Jr, Cecil P Staton and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Lewis v. Spellings et al
as 5:2017cv00261
Plaintiff:
Travis Earl Lewis
Defendant:
Margaret M.L. Spellings, W Louis Bissette, Jr, Cecil P Staton and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Hardy v. USA
as 5:2017cv00077
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Phillip Hardy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
HARDY v. COLVIN
as 1:2016cv01317
Plaintiff:
SHIRLEY G. HARDY
Defendant:
CAROLYN W. COLVIN
Interested_party:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Hardy v. Colvin
as 3:2016cv00746
Plaintiff:
Rosie M. Hardy
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2016cv00340
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Lattimore v. Mercer et al
as 5:2016ct03242
Plaintiff:
Don Orlando Lattimore
Defendant:
Sergeant K. Mercer, Officer McCumbee and Sergeant Hardie
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
