Cases 31 - 40 of 47
Hoog v. Social Security Administration
as 2:2015cv09123
Plaintiff:
Jerome J. Hoog
Defendant:
Social Security Administration, Commissioner of
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416
Hoog v. Chrysler Group LLC
as 1:2014cv02361
Plaintiff:
Tyler Hoog
Defendant:
Chrysler Group LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Jones et al v. Superior Energy Services L.L.C. et al
as 4:2014cv00990
Plaintiff:
Richard Jones , Scott Taylor , Aaron Rylander and others
Defendant:
Superior Energy Services L.L.C. and WARRIOR ENERGY SERVICES CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Stacey Bogan et al v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. et al
as 2:2014cv01484
Plaintiff:
Stacey Bogan, Francis Cass, James Hadfield and others
Defendant:
Does, JPMorgan Chase & Co. and JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.
Pines v. Hurst et al
as 3:2014cv00066
Defendant:
Cindy Hooge, Cliff Hurst, James LeBlanc and others
Interested Party:
William Kline
Plaintiff:
Micheal W. Pines
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hoog v. Chrysler Group, LLC
as 1:2013cv02302
Plaintiff:
Tyler Hoog
Defendant:
Chrysler Group, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Crenshaw v. Korbur
as 13-2072
Plaintiff - Appellant:
William Crenshaw
Defendant - Appellee:
Sgt. G. Korbur, DSP J. Thompson, Supt. J. Berbery and others
Unite Eurotherapy, Inc. et al v. Cosmetic Haircare BV et al
as 3:2013cv01144
Plaintiff:
Unite Eurotherapy, Inc. and Unite Eurotherapy Ltd
Defendant:
Cosmetic Haircare BV, Thema Haircare BV, Hooge Beheer BV and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 44 Trademark Infringement
De Hoog v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2013cv00235
Plaintiff:
Randal De Hoog
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416
Robert Hoog, et al v. Metropolitan Dade County
as 11-12055
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROBERT C. HOOG, JILL W. HOOG, his wife, MARSHA WHITTAKER, individually and others
Defendant - Appellee:
METROPOLITAN DADE COUNTY, a political subdivision of the State of Florida
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
