Cases 31 - 40 of 1,561
Drayton v. McIntyre et al
as 1:2023cv01308
Plaintiff:
Kapri Drayton
Defendant:
Amanda McIntyre, D. Horan, LT. Barrat and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Tunsil v. Laurel et al
as 1:2023cv01288
Plaintiff:
Barrett S. Tunsil
Defendant:
Harry Laurel, WellPath, Inc, Pennsylvania Attorney General and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Evans v. Howell et al
as 1:2023cv01274
Plaintiff:
Leeanne Evans
Defendant:
Howard Howell and 3M Trucking LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
HOWARD v. WELLPATH, LLC. et al
as 2:2023cv02862
Plaintiff:
LEON J. HOWARD
Defendant:
WELLPATH, LLC., DR. ANTHONY LETIZIO, MS. BRITTANY HUNER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Howard v. USA
as 4:2023cv01217
Petitioner:
Raymond Howard
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Schug v. Philips Respironics, Inc.
as 2:2023cv01295
Plaintiff:
Howard Schug
Defendant:
PHILIPS RESPIRONICS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Schug v. KONINKLIJKE PHILIPS N.V. et al
as 2:2023cv01273
Plaintiff:
Howard Schug
Defendant:
KONINKLIJKE PHILIPS N.V., PHILIPS NORTH AMERICA LLC., PHILIPS RS NORTH AMERICA LLC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Wright v. Bymes et al
as 1:2023cv01148
Plaintiff:
Howard Bruce Wright, Jr.
Defendant:
Dan Bymes and Mike Carroll
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
WILLIAMS v. WETZEL et al
as 2:2023cv01235
Plaintiff:
RASHAD M. WILLIAMS and MELVIN WILLIAMS
Defendant:
JOHN E. WETZEL, GEORGE LITTLE, LAUREL R. HARRY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Mokshefski v. Smith et al
as 3:2023cv01071
Plaintiff:
Michael Mokshefski
Defendant:
Jeffrey R. Smith, Todd Haskins, Prime Care and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
