Cases
Cases 31 - 38 of 38
ARCHIBALD v. SEATRAIN LINES, INC.
as 2:2010cv31096
Plaintiff: HURBERT ARCHIBALD
Defendant: SEATRAIN LINES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Cheryl Cotterill v. City and County of San Francis, et al
as 09-17647
Plaintiff - Appellant: CHERYL COTTERILL
Defendant - Appellee: CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO, MATHEW MASON, HUGH HALL and others
WALLACE et al v. Norwegian Cruise Line Limited et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2009cv21814
Plaintiff: ABRAHAM WALLACE, GLENFORD PALMER, NOEL ROY PEART and others
Defendant: Norwegian Cruise Line Limited and NCL (Bahamas) LTD.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Fair Labor Standards
Type: Contract Both
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2008cv05332
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Cotterill v. City and County of San Francisco et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2008cv02295
Plaintiff: Cheryl Cotterill
Defendant: City and County of San Francisco, Mathew Mason, Hugh Hall and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
WILMETH et al v. NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY CO
as 2:2007cv73787
Plaintiff: ROBERT LARRY WILMETH and HURBERT RAY WOOD
Defendant: NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY CO
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2007cv00070
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Job Discrimination (Pregancy)
Noble, et al v. E.H. O'Neill Company, et al
as 1:2001cv00391
Defendant: Aqua-Chem, Inc., Asten Group, Inc., Congolium Corporation and others
Plaintiff: Maxwell Noble, Thearthur Aaron, Sr., Walls Cornelius Aaron, Sr. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?