Cases 31 - 40 of 62
Magnacharge LLC v. IKEA North America Services, LLC et al
as 4:2020cv00237
Plaintiff:
Magnacharge LLC
Defendant:
IKEA Dallas, L.P., and IKEA North America Services, LLC
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
PELLENS v. IKEA NORTH AMERICA SERVICES, LLC et al
as 2:2020cv01454
Plaintiff:
BRUCE PELLENS
Defendant:
CIGNA and IKEA NORTH AMERICA SERVICES, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1001
The Regents of the University of California v. Ikea of Sweden AB et al
as 2:2019cv06573
Defendant:
Ikea of Sweden AB, Ikea Distribution Services Inc., Ikea North America Services, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
The Regents of the University of California
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2019cv00929
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
TECHNICAL LED INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY, LLC v. IKEA NORTH AMERICA SERVICES, LLC
as 2:2019cv01394
Plaintiff:
TECHNICAL LED INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY, LLC
Defendant:
IKEA NORTH AMERICA SERVICES, LLC
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 145
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv01286
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621
ROBINSON et al v. IKEA NORTH AMERICA SERVICES, LLC et al
as 2:2019cv08994
Plaintiff:
SUSAN ROBINSON and DANIEL ROBINSON
Defendant:
IKEA PARAMUS, IKEA NORTH AMERICA SERVICES, LLC and JOHN DOES 1-10
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal- Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv00723
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv01034
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2018cv01643
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 626 Job Discrimination (Age)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
