Cases 31 - 40 of 115
In re: Indirect Purchaser Plaintiffs v. Toshiba Corporation, et al
as 20-16691
Petitioner / Appellant:
STEVEN HARRELSON, WALKER, WARREN & WATKINS, LLC, DONNA MUCCINO and others
Defendant / Appellee:
TOSHIBA AMERICA CONSUMER PRODUCTS, LLC, PANASONIC CORPORATION OF NORTH AMERICA, SAMSUNG SDI (MALAYSIA) SDN BHD and others
Plaintiff / Appellee:
INDIRECT PURCHASER PLAINTIFFS
Not Classified By Court:
In re: CATHODE RAY TUBE (CRT) ANTITRUST LITIGATION
Indirect Purchaser Plaintiffs v. Toshiba Corporation, et al
as 20-16081
Defendant / Appellee:
TOSHIBA AMERICA CONSUMER PRODUCTS, LLC, PANASONIC CORPORATION OF NORTH AMERICA, SAMSUNG SDI (MALAYSIA) SDN BHD and others
Plaintiff / Appellee:
INDIRECT PURCHASER PLAINTIFFS
Not Classified By Court:
In re: CATHODE RAY TUBE (CRT) ANTITRUST LITIGATION
Petitioner / Appellant:
THE ESTATE OF BARBARA CALDWELL, ANTHONY GIANASCA, CAROLYN JORGENSEN and others
Indirect Purchaser Plaintiffs v. Toshiba Corporation, et al
as 20-15697
Petitioner / Appellant:
HARRY GARAVANIAN, CHRIS SEUFERT, KERRY MURPHY and others
Defendant / Appellee:
TOSHIBA AMERICA CONSUMER PRODUCTS, LLC, PANASONIC CORPORATION OF NORTH AMERICA, SAMSUNG SDI (MALAYSIA) SDN BHD and others
Plaintiff / Appellee:
INDIRECT PURCHASER PLAINTIFFS
Not Classified By Court:
In re: CATHODE RAY TUBE (CRT) ANTITRUST LITIGATION
In re: Keurig Green Mountain Single-Serve Coffee Antitrust Litigation
as 1:2014md02542
Plaintiff:
Yelda Mesbah Bartlett, Bay Valley Foods, LLC, Lavinia Simona Biasell and others
Defendant:
Green Mountain Coffee Roasters, Inc., Keurig Green Mountain, Inc., Keurig Green Mountain, Inc., f/k/a Green Mountain Coffee Roasters, Inc., and as successor to Keurig, and others
Interested Party:
JBR, Inc. (d/b/a Rogers Family Company)
Alternative Dispute Resolution (Adr) Provider:
All Indirect Purchaser Plaintiffs
Petitioner:
Sagentia, Inc. and Sagentia, Ltd.
Special Master:
Hon. Barbara S. Jones
Not Classified By Court:
Amazon.Com, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
Enginuity, LLC v. Viega, LLC.
as 1:2019cv00159
Plaintiff:
Enginuity, LLC and Indirect Purchaser Plaintiffs
Defendant:
Viega, LLC.
Consolidated Plaintiff:
Homestead Heating & Plumbing, LLC, Airic's Heating & Air Conditioning, Inc., Al's Discount Plumbing LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
Indirect Purchaser Plaintiffs, et al v. Irico Group Corporation, et al
as 19-17428
Plaintiff / Appellee:
INDIRECT PURCHASER PLAINTIFFS and DIRECT PURCHASER PLAINTIFFS
Defendant:
SAMSUNG SDI CO., LTD., THOMSON CONSUMER ELECTRONICS, INC., SAMSUNG SDI BRASIL LTDA. and others
Not Classified By Court:
In re: CATHODE RAY TUBE (CRT) ANTITRUST LITIGATION
Defendant / Appellant:
IRICO GROUP CORPORATION and IRICO DISPLAY DEVICES CO., LTD.
In re: Keurig Green Mountain Single-Serve Coffee Antitrust Litigation
as 1:2014mc02542
Defendant:
Keurig Green Mountain, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Indirect Purchasers, Direct Purchasers, JBR Inc and others
Indirect Purchaser Plaintiffs, et al v. Panasonic Corporation, et al
as 19-16855
Defendant / Appellee:
LG CHEM, LTD., HITACHI MAXWELL, LTD., SANYO NORTH AMERICA CORPORATION and others
Plaintiff / Appellee:
INDIRECT PURCHASER PLAINTIFFS
Not Classified By Court:
In re: LITHIUM ION BATTERIES ANTITRUST LITIGATION
Not Yet Classified:
GORDON B. MORGAN
Christopher Andrews, et al v. Panasonic Corporation, et al
as 19-16803
Defendant / Appellee:
NEC TOKIN CORPORATION, LG CHEM, LTD., HITACHI MAXWELL, LTD. and others
Plaintiff / Appellee:
INDIRECT PURCHASER PLAINTIFFS
Not Classified By Court:
In re: LITHIUM ION BATTERIES ANTITRUST LITIGATION
Not Yet Classified:
CHRISTOPHER ANDREWS
In re: Polyurethane Foam Antitrust Litigation
as 1:2010md02196
Plaintiff:
Direct Action Plaintiff(s), Direct Purchaser Class, Indirect Purchaser Class and others
Defendant:
Defendants Liaison Counsel
Petitioner:
Arsenal Capital Partners
Special Master:
David Rosenblum Cohen
Intervenor:
The Dow Chemical Company
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
