Cases
Cases 31 - 40 of 194
Consumers for Auto Reliability and Safety, et al v. FTC
as 21-5249
Plaintiff / Appellant: Consumers for Auto Reliability and Safety, Center for Auto Safety and U.S. Public Interest Research Group
Defendant / Appellee: Federal Trade Commission
La Union Del Pueblo Entero, et al v. Gregory W. Abbott, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2021cv00844
Plaintiff: La Union Del Pueblo Entero, Friendship-West Baptist Church, The Anti-Defamation League Austin, Southwest, and Texoma and others
Consolidated Defendant: Isabel Longoria, Jacque Callanen, Yvonne Ramon and others
Defendant: Jose A. Esparza, Lupe C. Torres, Gregory W. Abbott and others
Consolidated Plaintiff: Houston Justice, Houston Area Urban League, Delta Sigma Theta Sorority Inc. and others
Counter Defendant: Dana DeBeauvoir
Amicus Curiae: Foundation for Government Accountability, John R. Ashcroft, Young Black Lawyers' Organizing Coalition and others
Petitioner: Public Interest Legal Foundation, Harris County Republican Party, Dallas County Republican Party and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1973 Voting Rights Act
United States of America v. The State of Georgia et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2021cv02575
Defendant: Brad Raffensperger, The State of Georgia and The Georgia State Election Board
Plaintiff: United States of America
Intervenor Defendant: Republican National Committee, National Republican Senatorial Committee and Georgia Republican Party Inc.
Amicus Curiae: Greater Georgia Action, Inc., American Center for Law and Justice, Members of Congress and others
Petitioner: Public Interest Legal Foundation and District of Columbia
Cause Of Action: 52 U.S.C. § 10301
Asbestos Disease Awareness Organization et al v. Regan et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2021cv03716
Plaintiff: Environmental Information Center, Vermont Public Interest Research Group, Raja Flores, MD and others
Defendant: Michael Regan and United States Environmental Protection Agency
Migrant Clinicians Network, et al v. USEPA, et al
as 21-70719
Petitioner: CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY, NATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL, FARMWORKER JUSTICE and others
Respondent: U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY and MICHAEL REGAN, in his official capacity as Administrator of the United States Environmental Protection Agency
County of Santa Clara, et al v. USHHS, et al
as 21-70558
Petitioner: AMERICAN LUNG ASSOCIATION, NATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL, CENTER FOR SCIENCE IN THE PUBLIC INTEREST and others
Respondent: NORRIS COCHRAN, in his official capacity as Acting Secretary of Health and Human Services and U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES
County of Santa Clara et al v. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services et al
as 5:2021cv01655
Defendant: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services and Norris Cochran
Plaintiff: Center for Science in the Public Interest, County of Santa Clara, National Association of Pediatric Nurse Practitioners and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551
Alliance for Water Efficiency v. United States Department
as 21-428
Petitioner: Environment America, U.S. Public Interest Research Group and Alliance for Water Efficiency
Respondent: United States Department of Energy and David G. Huizenga, Acting Secretary, United States Department of Energy
Alliance for Water Efficiency, et al v. DOE, et al
as 21-1166
Petitioner: ENVIRONMENT AMERICA, U.S. PUBLIC INTEREST RESEARCH GROUP and ALLIANCE FOR WATER EFFICIENCY
Respondent: UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY and DAVID G. HUIZENGA, Acting Secretary, United States Department of Energy
Alliance for Water Efficiency, et al v. DOE, et al
as 21-1167
Petitioner: ENVIRONMENT AMERICA, U.S. PUBLIC INTEREST RESEARCH GROUP and ALLIANCE FOR WATER EFFICIENCY
Respondent: UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY and DAVID G. HUIZENGA, Acting Secretary, United States Department of Energy

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?