Cases 31 - 40 of 5,158
Schuj v. United States of America
as 7:2024cv00364
Plaintiff:
Martin J Schuj
Defendant:
United States of America
Scarborough v. O'Malley
as 5:2024cv00232
Plaintiff:
Lachele Scarborough
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley
Interested Party:
SSA-Office of General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
SPENCE v. TOLBERT et al
as 1:2024cv00337
Plaintiff:
KENYON J. SPENCE
Defendant:
SGT. TOLBERT and SGT. LENWOOD GRAHAM
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
J. R. et al v. Atrium Health, Inc.
as 3:2024cv00382
Plaintiff:
J. R. and J. S.
Defendant:
Atrium Health, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 2511 Wiretapping
Bennett v. O'Malley
as 7:2024cv00258
Plaintiff:
Allison Bennett
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley
Interested Party:
SSA-Office of General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Perry v. O'Malley
as 7:2024cv00249
Plaintiff:
Latrish Perry
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley
Interested Party:
SSA-Office of General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Shook v. McNally et al
as 1:2024cv00100
Plaintiff:
Jesse L. Shook
Defendant:
Charles J. McNally, Norma Biddix and Mike Slagle
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
LUFKIN v. O'MALLEY
as 1:2024cv00303
Plaintiff:
NILDA LUFKIN
Defendant:
MARTIN J. O'MALLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Frannicola et al v. Real Time Resolutions, Inc. et al
as 5:2024cv00206
Plaintiff:
Arthur J Frannicola and Joy A Frannicola
Defendant:
Real Time Resolutions, Inc. and RRA 2 CP, LLC, Real Time Resolutions, Inc. and RRA 2 CP, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601 Truth in Lending
SMITH v. O'MALLEY
as 1:2024cv00299
Plaintiff:
SHANNON SMITH
Defendant:
Martin J O'Malley and MARTIN J. O'MALLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416 Denial of Social Security Benefits
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
