Cases 31 - 40 of 69
USA v. Amos Moss
as 16-13476
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
AMOS J. MOSS
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2015cv00555
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Intervenor_defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1334
Waldrop v. Columbia County S. O. et al
as 1:2015cv00174
Plaintiff:
Nicholas John Waldrop
Defendant:
Columbia County S. O., Carrie Wokutch, D. Burlingham and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Moss v. Hedgemon, et al
as 2:2015cv02299
Plaintiff:
Johnny J. Moss
Defendant:
Johnny Hedgemon
Respondent:
Attorney General State of Louisiana
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Moss v. River Bend Detention Center
as 5:2014cv03035
Plaintiff:
Johnny J Moss, Jr
Defendant:
Warden River Bend Detention Center
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Emigh et al v. West Calcasieu Cameron Hospital et al
as 2:2014cv02808
Plaintiff:
Aaron Emigh , Glynn Able Benoit and Laura Allison Delouche
Defendant:
West Calcasieu Cameron Hospital , Highmark Inc , Louisiana Health Service & Indemnity Co and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1132
Moss v. Richy et al
as 6:2014cv00332
Plaintiff:
Terrance J Moss
Defendant:
Linda Richy, Bill Pierce and John Rupert
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MOSS v. GEARED 2 SERVE STAFFING, LLC et al
as 1:2014cv00546
Defendant:
GEARED 2 SERVE STAFFING, LLC and RICK HARTMAN
Plaintiff:
HOMER J. MOSS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Labor/Mgmnt. Relatio
Best v. Richy et al
as 6:2014cv00180
Plaintiff:
Anthony Best, Shelton Johnson, Jason Ortega and others
Defendant:
Linda Richy, Bill Pierce and John Rupert
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
United States of America v. Moss et al
as 6:2013cv01338
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Jeffrey W. Moss, Angie Moss, Tom J. Moss and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
