Cases 31 - 40 of 58
L A Printex Industries Inc v. MRS Inc et al
as 2:2011cv07651
Defendant:
Does, Harkham Industries Inc, J C Penney Company Inc and others
Plaintiff:
L A Printex Industries Inc
Optimize Technology Solutions, LLC v. Staples, Inc. et al
as 2:2011cv00419
Plaintiff:
Optimize Technology Solutions, LLC
Defendant:
Staples, Inc. , Dillard's, Inc. , drugstore.com, inc. and others
Counter_claimant:
L.L. Bean, Inc. and HSN, Inc.
Counter_defendant:
Optimize Technology Solutions, LLC
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Paulo v. J. C. Penney Corporation, Inc. et al
as 1:2011cv11520
Plaintiff:
Sharon Paulo
Defendant:
J. C. Penney Corporation, Inc. and J. C. Penney Company, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2011cv00547
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2011cv00549
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621
Moak v. J. C. Penney Company, Inc. et al
as 3:2010cv00881
Plaintiff:
Etta Moak
Defendant:
J. C. Penney Company, Inc. and John Does 1-10
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Tiller v. J. C. Penney Company, Inc. et al
as 3:2010cv00861
Plaintiff:
Betty Tiller
Defendant:
J. C. Penney Company, Inc. and John Does 1-10
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
U.S. Ethernet Innovations, LLC v. AT&T Inc. et al
as 5:2010cv05254
Plaintiff:
U.S. Ethernet Innovations, LLC
Defendant:
Barnes & Noble, Inc. , J. C. Penney Company, Inc. , Sally Beauty Holdings, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2010cv06721
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
LA Printex Industries, Inc. v. Bealls, Inc. et al
as 2:2010cv03704
Defendant:
Bealls, Inc., Belk, Inc., Burlington Coat Factory Direct Corporation and others
Plaintiff:
LA Printex Industries, Inc.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
