Cases 31 - 40 of 145
Nye et al v. Town of Rehoboth et al
as 1:2021cv11167
Plaintiff:
Lorraine Nye and Cheryl Devolle
Defendant:
Town of Rehoboth, Rehoboth Police Department, James J. Trombetta and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Nye et al v. Brown et al
as 1:2021cv11166
Plaintiff:
Lorraine Nye, Cheryl Devolle and Chief James Trombetter
Defendant:
Police Officer Douglas Brown, Deputy Chief Mark Rossi, Craig Forget and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Richardson Jr. v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2021cv11129
Plaintiff:
John Jacob Richardson Jr.
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Bassett v Blitt
as 1:2021cv10899
Defendant:
Cameron Rose doing business as Colton Grey, John Doe #14 doing business as Magdeline St. Michaels, Vivid Canada Entertainment, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Leah Bassett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338
Rosko v. Keolis Commuter Services, LLC.
as 1:2021cv10098
Defendant:
Keolis Commuter Services, LLC.
Plaintiff:
Jacob Lee Rosko
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51
Jacob v. Det Guy
as 1:2020cv12009
Defendant:
Guy and Det Guy
Plaintiff:
Michael Jacob
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Jacobs v. The Cheesecake Factory Restaurants, Inc.
as 1:2020cv10257
Plaintiff:
Marilyn Jacobs
Defendant:
THE CHEESECAKE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Varisse v. Western New England University et al
as 3:2020cv30017
Defendant:
Family Health Center of Worcester, Inc., Yvonne Bogle, Hamed Gilzad Kohan and others
Plaintiff:
Marie Varisse
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Mathew Almeida v. Duclos
as 1:2020cv10142
Plaintiff:
Jacobs I Mathew Almeida
Defendant:
Daniel J. Duclos
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jacobs et al v. MA State Police
as 1:2019cv12262
Plaintiff:
Marilyn Jacobs and Lisa Jacobs
Defendant:
MA State Police
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
