Cases 31 - 40 of 42
Global Naps, Inc. v. Verizon New England, Inc. et al
as 1:2010mc00046
Defendant:
James Connelly, W. Robert Keating, MA Department of Telecommunications and Energy and others
Plaintiff:
Global Naps, Inc.
Receiver:
Carl F. Jenkins
Global NAPs, Inc. v. Verizon New England, Inc. et al
as 1:2010mc00065
Plaintiff:
Global NAPs, Inc.
Defendant:
Verizon New England, Inc., Massachusetts Department of Telecommunications and Energy, Paul B. Vasington and others
Receiver:
Carl F. Jenkins
Global Naps, Inc. v. Verizon New England, Inc. et al
as 1:2010mc00194
Plaintiff:
Global Naps, Inc.
Defendant:
Verizon New England, Inc., Massachusetts Department of Telecommunications and Energy, Paul B. Vasington and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 754
Global NAPS, Inc. v. Verizon New England, Inc. et al
as 2:2010mc00008
Plaintiff:
Global NAPs, Inc.
Defendant:
Verizon New England, Inc., Massachusetts Department of Telecommunications and Energy, Paul B. Vasington and others
Receiver:
Carl F. Jenkins
Global Naps, Inc. v. Verizon New England, Inc., et al
as 09-1309
Plaintiff:
GLOBAL NAPS, INC.
Defendant - Appellee:
VERIZON NEW ENGLAND, doing business as Verizon Massachusetts
Defendant:
MA DEPT OF TELECOMMUNICATIONS & ENERGY, PAUL B. VASINGTON, in his capacity as Commissioner, JAMES CONNELLY, in his capacity as Commissioner and others
Third Party Defendant - Appellant:
FRANK T. GANGI
Third Party Defendant:
GLOBAL NAPS NEW HAMPSHIRE, INC., GLOBAL NAPS REALTY, INC., CHESAPEAKE INVESTMENT SERVICES, INC. and others
:
, , and others
Global Naps, Inc., et al v. MA Dept of Telecommunications, et al
as 09-1308
Plaintiff - Appellant:
GLOBAL NAPS, INC.
Defendant:
MA DEPT OF TELECOMMUNICATIONS & ENERGY, PAUL B. VASINGTON, in his capacity as Commissioner, JAMES CONNELLY, in his capacity as Commissioner and others
Defendant - Appellee:
VERIZON NEW ENGLAND, doing business as Verizon Massachusetts
Third Party Defendant - Appellant:
GLOBAL NAPS NEW HAMPSHIRE, INC., GLOBAL NAPS REALTY, INC., GLOBAL NAPS NETWORKS, INC. and others
Third Party Defendant:
1120 HANCOCK STREET, INC., FRANK T. GANGI, 321 HEATH STREET REALTY TRUST and others
Interested Party - Amicus Curiae:
PACIFIC BELL TELEPHONE COMPANY
:
, , and others
Global Naps, Inc. v. Verizon New England, Inc., et al
as 09-1041
Plaintiff:
GLOBAL NAPS, INC.
Defendant - Appellee:
VERIZON NEW ENGLAND, doing business as Verizon Massachusetts
Defendant:
MA DEPT OF TELECOMMUNICATIONS & ENERGY, PAUL B. VASINGTON, in his capacity as Commissioner, JAMES CONNELLY, in his capacity as Commissioner and others
Third Party Defendant - Appellant:
FRANK T. GANGI
Third Party Defendant:
GLOBAL NAPS NEW HAMPSHIRE, INC., GLOBAL NAPS REALTY, INC., CHESAPEAKE INVESTMENT SERVICES, INC. and others
:
, , and others
Global Naps, Inc., et al v. Verizon New England, Inc., et al
as 09-1042
Plaintiff - Appellant:
GLOBAL NAPS, INC.
Defendant:
MA DEPT OF TELECOMMUNICATIONS & ENERGY, PAUL B. VASINGTON, in his capacity as Commissioner, JAMES CONNELLY, in his capacity as Commissioner and others
Defendant - Appellee:
VERIZON NEW ENGLAND, doing business as Verizon Massachusetts
Third Party Defendant - Appellant:
GLOBAL NAPS NEW HAMPSHIRE, INC., GLOBAL NAPS REALTY, INC., GLOBAL NAPS NETWORKS, INC. and others
Third Party Defendant:
1120 HANCOCK STREET, INC., FRANK T. GANGI, 321 HEATH STREET REALTY TRUST and others
:
, , and others
Global Naps, Inc., et al v. Verizon New England, et al
as 08-1278
Plaintiff - Appellant:
GLOBAL NAPS, INC.
Defendant - Appellant:
GLOBAL NAPS, INC., GLOBAL NAPS, INC., CHESAPEAKE INVESTMENT SERVICES, INC. and others
Defendant - Appellee:
VERIZON NEW ENGLAND
Defendant:
MA DEPT OF TELECOMMUNICATIONS & ENERGY, PAUL B. VASINGTON, JAMES CONNELLY and others
:
, , and others
BOKHARI v. LAKEWOOD PATHOLOGY ASSOCIATES, INC. et al
as 2:2007cv05009
Defendant:
WATER STREET HEALTHCARE PARTNERS, LLC, LAKEWOOD PATHOLOGY ASSOCIATES, INC., LAKEWOOD HOLDING CORP. and others
Plaintiff:
SYED RAZA BOKHARI
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
