Cases 31 - 40 of 50
WHITE ARROYO v. WEXFORD HEALTH SOURCES, INC. et al
as 1:2016cv00448
Plaintiff:
Amy L. White Arroyo
Defendant:
Wexford Health Sources Inc. , Jose Boggio , Eubanks and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JOHNSON v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2016cv00086
Plaintiff:
MELVIN DAVIS JOHNSON
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, BRUCE HERDMAN, CORRECTIONS OFFICERS JOHN DOE #1-10 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HAND v. SWINTON-KAVA et al
as 2:2015cv06826
Plaintiff:
TARAUN CORTEZ HAND
Defendant:
SHYRIL SWINTON-KAVA, MARK MENKE, JOHN/JANE DOE(S) #1 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WHITE ARROYO v. WEXFORD HEALTH SOURCES, INC. et al
as 2:2015cv01509
Plaintiff:
AMY L. WHITE ARROYO
Defendant:
WEXFORD HEALTH SOURCES, INC., JOSE BOGGIO, EUBANKS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SANTODOMINGO-ROSADO v. LAXTON et al
as 5:2015cv04033
Plaintiff:
EDWIN SANTODOMINGO-ROSADO
Defendant:
MATTHEW LAXTON, BLAKE KUNTZ, ANTHONY C. LEARDI, JR. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BERNARD v. ROZUM et al
as 3:2015cv00167
Plaintiff:
RAYMOND BERNARD
Defendant:
GERALD L. ROZUM, DANIEL GEHLMANN, JOHN/JANE DOES NUMBER 1 TO 5 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
FLORES BERRIOS v. SWEENEY et al
as 5:2015cv00510
Plaintiff:
SHEILA FLORES BERRIOS
Defendant:
EDWARD SWEENEY , DALE MEISEL , JANINE DONATE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Miller v. Bradford et al
as 3:2014cv01372
Plaintiff:
Ricky Miller
Defendant:
Kevin R Bradford, Douglas J. Jacobs, Raymond J Tonkin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BUTLER v. LAMONT et al
as 5:2014cv03733
Plaintiff:
JEFFREY BUTLER
Defendant:
CONRAD LAMONT, JOHN/JANE DOE GUARDS #1-X, JOHN/JANE DOE SUPERVISORS #1-X and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Mecca v. Black et al
as 3:2013cv01121
Plaintiff:
Shawna Mecca
Defendant:
Joseph Black, Murray, Robert McMillan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
