Cases 31 - 40 of 67
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2016cv00134
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1334
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv00447
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
ESPOSITO v. JP MORGAN CHASE BANK NA et al
as 1:2015cv01232
Plaintiff:
FRANK J. ESPOSITO, JR.
Defendant:
JP MORGAN CHASE BANK NA, JP MORGAN SECURITIES LLC, JON RAMEY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
GODFREY et al v. BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON
as 1:2015cv00138
Defendant:
BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY GODFREY, CURTIS GODFREY, JP MORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv00329
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
QUIMBY v. CALIBER HOME LOANS et al
as 1:2014cv01335
Defendant:
CALIBER HOME LOANS and JP MORGAN CHASE & CO.
Plaintiff:
DONALD LEWIS QUIMBY
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 1725 Collection under Contract Guaranty
HILL v. JP MORGAN CHASE BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION et al
as 1:2014cv00533
Plaintiff:
DEREK HILL
Defendant:
TANYA HILL, JP MORGAN CHASE BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, JOHN MOSES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Monarch Consult, Inc. et al v. JP Morgan Chase et al
as 3:2014cv00674
Plaintiff:
Monarch Consult, Inc. and Monarch Consulting, LLC
Defendant:
Castle Rock Bank and JP Morgan Chase Bank NA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv00285
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
JP Morgan Chase Bank National Association v. Roberts
as 4:2014cv00005
Plaintiff:
JP Morgan Chase Bank National Association
Defendant:
Michael A Roberts
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
