Cases 31 - 40 of 249
MICKLES v. USA
as 1:2022cv01126
Petitioner:
JESSE MICKLES
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Woods v. Neal
as 3:2022cv00502
Petitioner:
Jess David Woods
Respondent:
Ron Neal
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Woods v. Neal
as 2:2022cv00162
Petitioner:
Jess David Woods
Defendant:
Warden Ron Neal
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
DOBBS v. GORE
as 1:2022cv00664
Plaintiff:
JESSE DOBBS
Defendant:
STATE REP. MITCH GORE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
SINGH et al v. INDIANA STATE EXCISE POLICE et al
as 1:2022cv00474
Plaintiff:
LAKHWANT SINGH, KAMALJIT KAUR, LAKHWINDER SINGH and others
Defendant:
INDIANA STATE EXCISE POLICE, ALAN WOMBOLT, INDIANA STATE POLICE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
ATWOOD v. CITY OF SHELBYVILLE et al
as 3:2021cv00165
Plaintiff:
JESSE EDWARD ATWOOD
Defendant:
CITY OF SHELBYVILLE, DEPARTMENT OF CHILD SERVICES, SHELBY COUNTY PUBLIC DEFENDERS OFFICE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv02893
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
The Prudential Insurance Company of America v. Fish et al
as 2:2021cv00341
Plaintiff:
The Prudential Insurance Company of America
Defendant:
Jesse Allen Fish, Emily Ann Fish, Theresa Dondzila and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1335
MCVICKER v. CITY OF BEDFORD, INDIANA et al
as 1:2021cv02914
Plaintiff:
STANLEY K. MCVICKER
Defendant:
CITY OF BEDFORD, INDIANA, BEDFORD POLICE DEPARTMENT, LAWRENCE COUNTY JAIL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
OZIER v. CITY OF JEFFERSONVILLE et al
as 4:2021cv00125
Plaintiff:
KELVIN OZIER
Defendant:
INDIANA CITY OF JEFFERSONVILLE, NIKOLAI BOYAR, Chief KENNY KAVANAUGH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
