Cases 31 - 40 of 108
Thurman v. St. Louis County et al
as 4:2021cv00816
Plaintiff:
Adrianna Thurman
Defendant:
St. Louis County, Jim Buckles, Julia Murphy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith, et al v. Reynolds County, Missouri et al
as 1:2021cv00095
Defendant:
Tom Stout, Cody Newman, Reynolds County, Missouri and others
Plaintiff:
I. S., Maud Smith and E. S.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Balducci v Missouri Department of Corrections, et al
as 2:2021cv04022
Plaintiff:
Carilyn Balducci
Defendant:
Ryan Brownlow, Missouri Dept of Corrections, John 2 Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
v. City of St. Charles et al
as 4:2019cv01896
Defendant:
St. Charles County Department of Corrections, Larry Crawford, City of St. Charles and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Terrill v. City of St. Charles et al
as 4:2019cv01897
Plaintiff:
Michael Terrill
Defendant:
St. Charles County Department of Corrections, Crawford Larry, City of St. Charles and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Woods v. Doe et al
as 6:2019cv03091
Defendant:
Holland, Welch, Terry and others
Plaintiff:
Darrell Woods
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Harris v. Hays et al
as 4:2018cv02072
Defendant:
cody bennett, Stanley Payne, Troy Steele and others
Plaintiff:
Rodriquez Harris
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Seaton v. Johnson County Jail et al
as 2:2018cv00105
Defendant:
T. Bredeman, Robert Wudel, Missouri Deparment of Corrections and others
Plaintiff:
Richard A. Seaton, Sr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Elbert v. City of Kansas City Missouri et al
as 4:2018cv00788
Defendant:
Shericka Doe, Shanise Doe, John 4 Doe and others
Plaintiff:
Richard M Elbert
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pennell v. Vernon County MO et al
as 3:2018cv05040
Defendant:
Vernon County MO, Jason Mosher, Eric Terry and others
Plaintiff:
Jory Pennell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
