Cases 31 - 40 of 320
Creel v. Junker et al
as 5:2023ct03243
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Ray Creel
Defendant:
Gary Junker, Dr. Arthur Campbell, Debra Fitzgerald and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
YAH'TORAH v. BROWN et al
as 1:2023cv00697
Plaintiff:
ZION'ELIYAH YAH'TORAH
Defendant:
MICHAEL BROWN, LORIE L. OTT, GET IT DONE SOLUTIONS LLC. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
THOMAS v. JOHN DOE 1-4
as 1:2023cv00372
Plaintiff:
Dalveccio T. Thomas
Defendant:
John Doe 1-4
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thomas v. John Doe 1-4
as 5:2023ct03141
Plaintiff:
Dalveccio T. Thomas
Defendant:
John Doe 1-4
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Vazquez v. Trantham et al
as 1:2023cv00111
Plaintiff:
Hugo Fabian Pinacho Vazquez
Defendant:
Patrick Elijah Trantham, Chip Hall, Sylva Police Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Brown v. Brown
as 3:2023cv00230
Plaintiff:
Anthony T Brown
Defendant:
Jacqueline Anderson Brown and John Does 1-10
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Libel, Assault, Slander
Hubbard v. Wallenstein et al
as 3:2023cv00202
Plaintiff:
Marc Hubbard
Defendant:
Marc A. Wallenstein, William A. Harrison, Leslie E. Osbourne, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Esterhay v. Ten Oaks Management, LLC et al
as 3:2023cv00203
Plaintiff:
John Esterhay
Defendant:
Ten Oaks Management, LLC, ASTECH Holdings, LLC, Andrew Lovrovich and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Taylor v. Doe 1 et al
as 1:2023cv00098
Plaintiff:
Rodwyn Antonio Taylor
Defendant:
John Doe 1, John Doe 2 and John Doe 3
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ardis v. Dickey et al
as 5:2023cv00150
Plaintiff:
Robert Michael Ardis
Defendant:
Darlene Dickey, William Eddins, Sarah Harper-Crutchfield and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
