Cases 31 - 40 of 54
Mark Hughes v. Robert Carter, et al
as 19-1967
Defendant / Appellee:
ROBERT E. CARTER, Comm., KEITH BUTTS, Warden, DOES 1-100 and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MARK S. HUGHES
HUGHES v. CARTER et al
as 1:2019cv01809
Defendant:
DOES 1-100, CARL KUENZLI, ROBERT E. CARTER and others
Plaintiff:
MARK S. HUGHES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BAILEY v. WEXFORD HEALTH IND. LLC. et al
as 2:2019cv00082
Defendant:
THOMAS WELLINGTON, WEXFORD HEALTH IND. LLC., RICHARD BROWN and others
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER R. BAILEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
POINDEXTER v. CUTLIFF et al
as 2:2019cv00080
Defendant:
JAMES FREEMAN, SAMUEL BYRD, JOHN DOE and others
Plaintiff:
JWAUN L. POINDEXTER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HARLOW v. TERRE HAUTE REGIONAL HOSPITAL et al
as 2:2018cv00530
Defendant:
MERIDIAN RADIOLOGY, WEST DENNING, ZACHARY WORLEY and others
Plaintiff:
AARON HARLOW
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
UNDERWOOD v. BROWN et al
as 2:2018cv00425
Defendant:
WEXFORD HEALTH SOURCES, INC., RICHARD BROWN, JOHN DOE and others
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER A. UNDERWOOD
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BERRY v. KNIGHT et al
as 1:2018cv02644
Defendant:
RILEY GROOVER, WEXFORD HEALTH CARE, BARNS DOE and others
Plaintiff:
EARLIE B.A. BERRY, JR.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stewart v. Schotimer et al
as 3:2018cv00518
Undetermined:
MIAMI E-FILE(Court Use Only)
Defendant:
Mrs Bowman, Mr Stoll, John Doe and others
Plaintiff:
Joseph Stewart
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WELLS v. KUENZLI et al
as 2:2018cv00267
Defendant:
DICK BROWN, SAMUEL BYRD, JACKIE DENNING and others
Plaintiff:
QUANARDEL WELLS
Miscellaneou:
WVCF (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SERNA v. WEXFORD MED. SERV. et al
as 2:2018cv00213
Defendant:
SAMUEL BYRD, JACKIE DENNING, KUENZLI and others
Plaintiff:
BRANDON SERNA
Miscellaneou:
WVCF (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
