Cases 31 - 40 of 178
ELLIS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2022cv03623
Plaintiff:
KEITH EDWARD ELLIS
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Moss v. Salmon
as 7:2022cv00039
Petitioner:
Keith Edward Moss
Respondent:
Joshua Salmon and Major Moore
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Morrow v. Fleegle et al
as 2:2021cv05193
Plaintiff:
Michael Ledante Morrow
Defendant:
Mark C Fleegle, John Liddle, Tamas Tabor and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gardiner v. Corizon Health Inc. et al
as 2:2021cv00167
Plaintiff:
Keith Edward Gardiner #383334
Defendant:
Corizon Health, Inc., Unknown Bedient, Unknown Bergh and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gardiner v. Corizon Health Inc. et al
as 2:2021cv00166
Plaintiff:
Keith Edward Gardiner #383334
Defendant:
Corizon Health, Inc., Dennis Smith, Unknown Bedient and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McClure v. C.R. Bard, Inc et al
as 2:2021cv02881
Plaintiff:
Keith Edward McClure
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Moss v. Salmon et al
as 7:2021cv00233
Defendant:
Sgt. Draper, Officer Sparrow, Nurse Lucas and others
Plaintiff:
Keith Edward Moss
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Moss v. Zuidema et al
as 7:2021cv00234
Defendant:
Officer C.N. Harris, Officer Rippy, The City of Lynchburg and others
Plaintiff:
Keith Edward Moss
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Keith Allen v. David Shinn, et al
as 21-15438
Respondent / Appellee:
DAVID SHINN, Director and ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE STATE OF ARIZONA
Petitioner / Appellant:
KEITH EDWARD ALLEN
KELSO v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv01288
Plaintiff:
KEITH EDWARD KELSO
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
