Cases
Cases 31 - 40 of 46
DOOLEY v. SUPERINTENDENT We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2017cv01620
Petitioner: DORRIS L Y DOOLEY
Respondent: SUPERINTENDENT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
DOOLEY v. SUPERINTENDENT
as 1:2017cv01618
Petitioner: DORRIS L Y DOOLEY
Respondent: SUPERINTENDENT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
DOOLEY v. SUPERINTENDENT We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2017cv01324
Petitioner: DORRIS L Y DOOLEY
Respondent: SUPERINTENDENT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
DOOLEY v. SUPERINTENDENT We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2017cv01087
Petitioner: DORRIS L Y DOOLEY
Respondent: SUPERINTENDENT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Dooley v. Superintendent
as 1:2017cv00121
Petitioner: Dorris L Y Dooley
Respondent: Superintendent
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Dooley v. Superintendent We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2017cv00117
Petitioner: Dorris L Y Dooley
Respondent: Superintendent
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv01408
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1400 Civil Rights of Handicapped Child
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2014cv02469
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
STRONG et al v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
as 1:2012cv00353
Plaintiff: MICAIAH STRONG , M. S. , DORIS WOOD and others
Defendant: DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1400
L & Y INTERNATIONAL S.A. v. BBK SALES & MARKETING INC
as 2:2009cv01528
Plaintiff: L & Y INTERNATIONAL S.A.
Defendant: BBK SALES & MARKETING INC
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 1 U.S. Arbitration Act
Type: Other Statutes None

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?