Cases 31 - 40 of 207
TOWNSEND v. LANE FURNITURE et al
as 1:2022cv00399
Defendant:
LANE FURNITURE, UNITED FURNITURE INDUSTRIES and JOSE MARTIR GAMEZ
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER LAMAR TOWNSEND
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
Bright v. Locklear et al
as 5:2022ct03137
Plaintiff:
Jackie Lamar Bright
Defendant:
Dean Locklear, Sgt. Sim, Sgt. Walliy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pinkard v. NC Department of Public Safety
as 5:2022ct03100
Plaintiff:
Tony Lamar Pinkard, Sr.
Defendant:
NC Department of Public Safety
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bright v. Bullet et al
as 5:2022ct03133
Plaintiff:
Jackie Bright and Jackie Lamar Bright
Defendant:
Lt. Bullet, Officer McNial, Officer Barn and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Coleman v. Albemarle District Jail
as 5:2022ct03010
Plaintiff:
Stye Lamar Coleman
Defendant:
Albemarle District Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Grey v. Lamar et al
as 4:2022cv00007
Plaintiff:
Raquan Grey
Defendant:
Officer Lamar, Officer Dobbs, Officer Jared and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2022cv00041
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0794 Job Discrimination (Handicap)
Anderson v. Dye et al
as 5:2021cv00168
Plaintiff:
Albert Marquavious Lamar Anderson
Defendant:
Eric Dye, FNU LNU, Jeffrey Duncan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Anderson v. Herring et al
as 5:2021ct03289
Plaintiff:
Albert Marquavious Lamar Anderson
Defendant:
Warden Herring, Mark Fleming, Maury Correctional Institution and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Davis v. Baker et al
as 5:2021ct03234
Plaintiff:
Joshual Lamar Davis
Defendant:
Jarrel Baker, Sheriff Deputy and Wake County Sheriff's Office
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
