Cases 31 - 40 of 93
Lanier et al v. Syngenta AG et al
as 7:2014cv00262
Plaintiff:
Richard F Lanier , Richard R Lanier, Jr. and William C Lanier
Defendant:
Syngenta AG, Syngenta Crop Protection AG, Syngenta Seeds, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Lanier v. Griffin
as 1:2014cv00252
Plaintiff:
Ricardo Edwin Lanier
Defendant:
FNU Griffin
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
Farrior et al v. Murphy-Brown, LLC
as 7:2014cv00184
Defendant:
Murphy-Brown, LLC
Plaintiff:
Tony Farrior , Kecia Farrior , Annie Harper and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Farrior et al v. Murphy-Brown, LLC
as 4:2014cv00158
Defendant:
Murphy-Brown, LLC
Plaintiff:
Tony Farrior , Kecia Farrior , Annie Harper and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Dayson v. Lanier, et al
as 4:2014cv00131
Plaintiff:
Patrick Michael Dayson
Defendant:
Herman Melvin Lanier, Lisa Marie Lanier, Mark Timothy Sain and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lanier v. Colvin
as 4:2013cv00212
Plaintiff:
Gail J. Lanier
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Delmont Promotions, LLC, et al v. Washington
as 5:2013cv00500
Plaintiff:
Delmont Promotions, LLC and Seekin' Entertainment LLC
Defendant:
Algernod Lanier Washington
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
EVANS v. GUILFORD COUNTY DETENTION CENTER ET AL
as 1:2013cv00499
Plaintiff:
GEORGE REYNOLD EVANS
Defendant:
GUILFORD COUNTY DETENTION CENTER, B.J. BARNES, LANIER and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Evans v. Guilford County Detention Center et al
as 7:2013cv00129
Plaintiff:
George Reynold Evans
Defendant:
Guilford County Detention Center, B.J. Barnes, Lanier and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
HALL v. USA
as 1:2012cv00954
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
ANTOINE LANIER HALL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
