Cases
Cases 31 - 40 of 352
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv00408
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 American Disabilities Act
Martin v. Foot Locker Retail, Inc.
as 3:2023cv00319
Plaintiff: Ruth Martin
Defendant: Foot Locker Retail, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Beason v. Brown County Sheriff's Department et al
as 6:2023cv00004
Plaintiff: Gary Don Beason
Defendant: Brown County Sheriff's Department, Carlisle Gover, FNU Benefeild and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Locker v. Golden Rule Insurance Company
as 2:2022cv13128
Plaintiff: John Locker
Defendant: Golden Rule Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1330 Breach of Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv06841
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Job Discrimination (Race)
Joe Hand Promotions, Inc. v. The Locker Room Bar and Grill LLC et al
as 4:2022cv03849
Plaintiff: Joe Hand Promotions, Inc.
Defendant: The Locker Room Bar and Grill LLC d/b/a The Locker Room Bar and Grill, d/b/a The Locker Room Bar & Grill, and d/b/a The Locker Room, Cedrick I. Ntuk and The Locker Room Bar and Grill LLC doing business as The Locker Room Bar and Grill doing business as The Locker Room
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Holt v. Foot Locker Retail We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 22-3240
Plaintiff / Appellant: DANIEL HOLT
Defendant / Appellee: FOOT LOCKER RETAIL, INC.
Ley Donna Lee Richardson v. Foot Locker Retail, Inc. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2022cv04474
Plaintiff: Ley Donna Lee Richardson
Defendant: Foot Locker Retail, Inc. and Does 1 through 50, Inclusive
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Personal Injury
Chandralekha Wickramasekaran, et al v. Amplify Energy Corporation, et al
as 22-55625
Plaintiff: CHANDRALEKHA WICKRAMASEKARAN, individually and as Trustees of the Wickramasekaran Family Trust, RAJASKARAN WICKRAMASEKARAN, individually and as Trustees of the Wickramasekaran Family Trust, EAST MEETS WEST EXCURSIONS and others
Defendant: AMPLIFY ENERGY CORPORATION, a Delaware corporation, BETA OPERATING COMPANY, LLC, a Delaware, limited liability company and SAN PEDRO BAY PIPELINE COMPANY
Not Yet Classified: DORDELLAS FINANCE CORPORATION and MSC MEDITERRANEAN SHIPPING COMPANY, S.A.
3Rd Party Defendant: M/V BEIJING, erroneously sued as the M/V Cosco Beijing and CAPETANISSA MARITIME CORPORATION
Chandralekha Wickramasekaran, et al v. Amplify Energy Corporation, et al
as 22-55629
Plaintiff: CHANDRALEKHA WICKRAMASEKARAN, individually and as Trustees of the Wickramasekaran Family Trust, RAJASKARAN WICKRAMASEKARAN, individually and as Trustees of the Wickramasekaran Family Trust, EAST MEETS WEST EXCURSIONS and others
Defendant: AMPLIFY ENERGY CORPORATION, a Delaware corporation, BETA OPERATING COMPANY, LLC, a Delaware, limited liability company and SAN PEDRO BAY PIPELINE COMPANY
Not Yet Classified: M/V BEIJING, erroneously sued as the M/V Cosco Beijing and CAPETANISSA MARITIME CORPORATION
3Rd Party Defendant: DORDELLAS FINANCE CORPORATION and MSC MEDITERRANEAN SHIPPING COMPANY, S.A.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?