Cases 31 - 40 of 69
National Railroad Passenger Corporation v. Arch Specialty Insurance Company et al
as 1:2014cv07510
Alternative Dispute Resolution (Adr) Provider:
Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's of London and Certain London Market Insurance Companies subscribing to Policy No. 507/N11NA08244 (Companies), Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's of London and Certain London Market Insurance Companies subscribing to Policy No. 507/N11NA08242, Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's of London and Certain London Market Insurance Companies subscribing to Policy No. 507/N11NA08241 and others
Defendant:
Torus Specialty Insurance Company, Commonwealth Insurance Company, Steadfast Insurance Company and others
Plaintiff:
National Railroad Passenger Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 oc
NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER CORPORATION v. ALLIANZ UNDERWRITERS INSURANCE COMPANY et al
as 1:2014cv01369
Plaintiff:
NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER CORPORATION
Defendant:
ALLIANZ UNDERWRITERS INSURANCE COMPANY , ALLSTATE INSURANCE COMPANY, AMERICAN HOME ASSURANCE COMPANY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2014cv00287
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158
Northrop Grumman Guidance and Electronics Company, Inc. v. Employers Insurance Company of Wausau et al
as 4:2013cv01154
Plaintiff:
Northrop Grumman Guidance and Electronics Company, Inc.
Defendant:
Employers Insurance Company of Wausau , OneBeacon America Insurance Company , Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's London and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Soo Line Railroad Company v. Certain Underwriter at Lloyd's London et al
as 0:2013cv03083
Plaintiff:
Soo Line Railroad Company
Defendant:
Certain Underwriter at Lloyd's London, Certain London Market Insurance Companies, Employers Surplus Line Insurance Company and others
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 1
UNITED REFINING COMPANY v. NATIONAL UNION FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY OF PITTSBURGH, PA et al
as 2:2013cv00909
Plaintiff:
UNITED REFINING COMPANY
Defendant:
NATIONAL UNION FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY OF PITTSBURGH, PA , ALLIANZ GLOBAL RISKS US INSURANCE COMPANY , CERTAIN UNDERWRITERS AT LLOYD'S OF LONDON AND LONDON MARKET INSURANCE COMPANIES and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Breach of Contract
Olin Corporation v. Insurance Company of North Ame
as 11-4579
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Olin Corporation
Third-Party-Defendant:
Olin-Hunt Specialty Products Inc.
Cross-Defendant:
Onebeacon American Insurance Company, referred to in this litigation as Commercial Union Insurance Company
Defendant:
Insurance Company of North America, Hanover Insurance Company, as successor to Massachusetts Bonding and Insurance Company, American Re-Insurance Company and others
Defendant - Appellant:
Century Indemnity Company
Olin Corporation v. Insurance Company of North Ame
as 11-4055
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Olin Corporation
Third-Party-Defendant:
Olin-Hunt Specialty Products Inc.
Cross-Defendant:
Onebeacon American Insurance Company, referred to in this litigation as Commercial Union Insurance Company
Defendant:
Insurance Company of North America, Hanover Insurance Company, as successor to Massachusetts Bonding and Insurance Company, American Re-Insurance Company and others
Defendant - Appellee:
American Home Assurance Company
Boston Gas Company v. Century Indemnity Company
as 11-1931
Plaintiff - Appellant:
BOSTON GAS COMPANY, d/b/a Keyspan Energy Keyspan LNG LP, d/b/a Keyspan Energy Delivery
Defendant - Appellee:
CENTURY INDEMNITY COMPANY
Third Party Defendant:
CERTAIN UNDERWRITERS AT LLOYD'S, LONDON, CERTAIN LONDON MARKET INSURANCE COMPANIES, TRAVELERS INSURANCE COMPANY, f/k/a Aetna Casualty & Surety Company and others
Interested Party:
MENDES & MOUNT, LLP and COMPLEX INSURANCE
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2011cv00340
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
