Cases 31 - 40 of 54
Barnes v. Greene et al (INMATE 1)
as 3:2012cv00127
Plaintiff:
Demario Shawn Barnes
Defendant:
George R. Greene, Kenneth Edwin Davis and J. Maxwell Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gray v. CHS Prison Medical et al
as 4:2011cv03631
Plaintiff:
Maxwell C Gray, Jr
Defendant:
CHS Prison Medical, Colleen Oakes and William Tally
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Maxwell v. E-Z-GO et al
as 2:2011cv00639
Plaintiff:
Thomas Maxwell
Defendant:
E-Z-GO , Textron, Inc. , Carts and Buggies, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Woods v. Maxwell (MAG+)
as 2:2011cv00626
Plaintiff:
Timothy Woods
Defendant:
Stanley B. Maxwell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams v. Clarke et al (INMATE 2)
as 3:2011cv00475
Plaintiff:
Johnny Materous Williams
Defendant:
Malvin Clarke, David Warren, Kalia Lane and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gray v. CMS Prison Medical et al
as 4:2011cv01714
Plaintiff:
Maxwell C Gray, Jr
Defendant:
CMS Prison Medical, C Oates and William Talley
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Maxwell v. Giles et al (INMATE 2)
as 3:2011cv00298
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Maxwell
Defendant:
J. C. Giles and Luther Strange
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Maxwell v. Allen et al
as 3:2010cv02066
Petitioner:
Michael Craig Maxwell
Respondent:
Richard Allen and Attorney General of the State of Alabama, The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Johnson et al v. Riley et al
as 7:2010cv02067
Plaintiff:
William Johnson , Annie Pearl Leftwich , Bobbie Morgan and others
Defendant:
Bob Riley and John M Tyson, Jr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1973
Francis et al v. Morgan Keegan & Co Inc et al
as 2:2010cv01624
Plaintiff:
J Timothy Francis , Frances N Francis and James L North
Defendant:
Morgan Keegan & Co Inc, MK Holding Inc, Carter E Anthony and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
