Cases 31 - 40 of 6,479
Miles v. Garland et al
as 4:2023cv04193
Plaintiff:
Harry Edwin Miles
Defendant:
Merrick B Garland, Dara L Darrow, Joe Billy McDade and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Michael B. Arouh et al v. GAN Limited et al
as 8:2023cv02001
Plaintiff:
Michael B. Arouh and Arouh Law, PLLC
Defendant:
GAN Limited, GAN Nevada, Inc., Dermot S. Smurfit and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 704 Labor Litigation
Baker et al v. Echols et al
as 1:2023cv00450
Plaintiff:
John Baker and Michelle Baker
Defendant:
Terrell J Echols, Quality Carriers Inc and Quality Carriers, Inc.
Not Classified By Court:
Michael B Langford
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
In re: James Esseks, et al
as 23-13524
Appellant:
In re: JAMES D. ESSEKS, CARL S. CHARLES, LATISHA GOTELL FAULKS and others
Not Classified By Court:
SERVICE
Oliver v. Collier et al
as 6:2023cv00715
Plaintiff:
James Oliver
Defendant:
Bryan Collier, Warden Michael B. Gruver, Asst. Warden Jonathan W. Clark and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv02004
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Varilease Finance, Inc. et al v. Wholesale Exotics, Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv08596
Plaintiff:
Varilease Finance, Inc. and VFI KR SPE I, LLC
Defendant:
Wholesale Exotics, Inc. and Michael B. Simon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
JACKSON v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv15724
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL B JACKSON
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
HUEBNER v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv03997
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL B HUEBNER
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
