Cases 31 - 40 of 481
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv00973
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal- Civil Rights Act
Taylor v. Anetrella et al
as 3:2023cv00043
Plaintiff:
Corey Taylor
Defendant:
f/n/u Anetrella, f/n/u Bolton and Metropolitan Government of Davidson County
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Taylor v. Trinity Correctional Food Services et al
as 3:2022cv00920
Plaintiff:
Corey Taylor
Defendant:
Trinity Correctional Food Services and Metropolitan Government, The
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv00877
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1400 Civil Rights of Handicapped Child
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv00934
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv00680
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Taylor v. Ryers et al
as 3:2022cv00689
Plaintiff:
Corey Taylor
Defendant:
E. Ryers, Metropolitan Government and E. Byers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Chilko et al
as 3:2022cv00557
Plaintiff:
Antonio Deshawn Smith
Defendant:
Officer Chilko, Officer Corneh, D. Puckett and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Taylor v. Wellpath Medical et al
as 3:2022cv00705
Plaintiff:
Corey Taylor
Defendant:
Wellpath Medical, Dr. Hoang Brian Nguyen and Davidson County Metropolitan Government
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 22-5761
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
