Cases 31 - 40 of 51
May v. CitiMortgage, Inc. et al
as 2:2012cv14603
Plaintiff:
Michael G. May
Defendant:
CitiMortgage, Inc. and ABN AMRO Mortgage Group, Inc.
United States of America v. $29,435.00 United States Currency
as 1:2012cv00018
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
$29,435.00 United States Currency
Claimant:
Michael Earl Mays, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 881
Panza v. May et al
as 2:2011cv15390
Plaintiff:
Jason Panza
Defendant:
Michael W. May and Firstfleet, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
USA v. Michael May
as 11-3998
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
MICHAEL B. MAY
May v. McGrath et al
as 2:2011cv00839
Plaintiff:
Michael Steven May
Defendant:
Doug McGrath , Brian West and Thomas Jenkins, SR
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010cv00253
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
CAROLINA CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY et al v. DE MAY et al
as 1:2010cv00511
Plaintiff:
CAROLINA CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY , MOORE & BRUCE, LLP , JONATHON R. MOORE and others
Defendant:
JAMES MICHAEL DE MAY, ANNE SCHRADER-DE MAY, COUNSELOR TRUST REG. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Interpleader Action
May et al v. Bayer Corporation et al
as 3:2010cv20140
Plaintiff:
Jennifer Kaye May, Jennifer Kaye May, Jennifer Kaye May and others
Defendant:
Bayer Corporation, Bayer Pharmaceuticals Corporation, Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
USA v. Michael May
as 09-4354
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
MICHAEL B. MAY
May et al v. Bayer Corporation et al
as 5:2009cv01195
Plaintiff:
Jennifer Kaye May and Michael L May
Defendant:
Bayer Corporation, Bayer Pharmaceuticals Corporation, Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
