Cases 31 - 40 of 164
ROSADO v. BARRACKS et al
as 2:2019cv05068
Defendant:
PSP. TROOPER MICHAEL P. D-U-G-A-N, LESLIE S. RICHARDS, PENNSYLVANIA. STATE. (DMV) and others
Plaintiff:
GERONIMO F. ROSADO, JR.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
HOLMES v. VEITH et al
as 2:2019cv01398
Defendant:
KARA MARIE SIDONE, ORLANDO HARPER, MICHAEL P. VEITH and others
Plaintiff:
HENRY JAMES HOLMES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
HOLMES v. VEITH et al
as 2:2019cv04794
Defendant:
KARA MARIE SIDONE, WARDEN: ORLANDO HARPER, MICHAEL P. VEITH and others
Plaintiff:
HENRY JAMES HOLMES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Carey v. Mt. Airy Casino and Resort et al
as 3:2019cv01351
Defendant:
Robert O'Hara, Cpl. Thomas C. Keegan, Amanda Lou Pedhegon and others
Plaintiff:
Jesse Jackson Carey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
IN RE: THE ESTATE OF MICHAEL P. HENNESSY v. CVS HEALTH CORPORATION
as 2:2019cv00579
Defendant:
CVS HEALTH CORPORATION
In Re:
IN RE: THE ESTATE OF MICHAEL P. HENNESSY
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185
DOLCH v. BET INVESTMENTS, INC. et al
as 2:2019cv01146
Defendant:
BET INVESTMENTS, INC. and MICHAEL P. MARKMAN
Plaintiff:
DANIEL DOLCH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
WOLF v. ZURICH AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY
as 2:2019cv00209
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL P. WOLF
Defendant:
ZURICH AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
HERSH v. RELLAHAN et al
as 2:2018cv03639
Defendant:
MICHAEL P. RELLAHAN, ERIN O'BRIEN and DAILY LOCAL NEWS
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER M. HERSH, SR.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
YOUNG et al v. BERKMAN
as 2:2018cv02940
Plaintiff:
LINDA A. YOUNG and MICHAEL P. YOUNG
Defendant:
CARL T. BERKMAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
AKINS v. DOUGLAS et al
as 2:2018cv02425
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL P. AKINS
Defendant:
MALCOLM T. DOUGLAS, ADVANCED DELIVERY SYSTEMS and EAST PHILADELPHIA FURNITURE SERVICES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
