Cases 31 - 40 of 46
Sanders v. McCoy (INMATE 2)
as 2:2020cv00817
Plaintiff:
Julius G. Sanders
Defendant:
Monica McCoy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sanders v. Ivey et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2020cv00814
Plaintiff:
Julius G. Sanders
Defendant:
Kay Ivey, Steven T. Marshall, John Crow and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thigpen v. Ivey et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2020cv00738
Defendant:
Kay Ivey, Steven T. Marshall, John Crow and others
Plaintiff:
Nathan Theortheli Thigpen
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Freeman v. McCoy et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2020cv00621
Defendant:
Lt. McCovery, Monica McCoy, Captain Danzey and others
Plaintiff:
Tovorris Leshawn Freeman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jackson v. Ivey et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2020cv00600
Defendant:
Kay Ivey, Steven T. Marshall, John Crow and others
Plaintiff:
Willie Arthur Jackson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rudd v. McCoy et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2020cv00561
Defendant:
Easterling Correctional Facility, Sgt. Thompkins, Alabama Department of Corrections and others
Plaintiff:
Allen Ray Rudd
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Coleman v. McCoy et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2020cv00570
Defendant:
Joseph Danzey, Jennifer McCovery, Jesse Stanford and others
Plaintiff:
Ronnie Rodriquez Coleman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jackson v. McCoy et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2020cv00756
Defendant:
Jennifer McCovery, Jesse Stanford, J. Shepard and others
Plaintiff:
Leon Lorenzo Jackson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
MCCOY v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON, INC. et al
as 3:2020cv09600
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER, INC. and JOHNSON & JOHNSON, INC.
Plaintiff:
MONICA MCCOY
In Re:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON TALCUM POWDER PRODUCTS MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Ward v. McCoy et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2020cv00482
Defendant:
Sgt. Spann, Anthony Crittenden, CO Key and others
Plaintiff:
Samuel Sirvoy Ward
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
