Cases 31 - 40 of 129
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00536
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Alicea v. Smith et al
as 3:2023cv00528
Plaintiff:
Maria Mercedes Alicea and Maria Alicea
Defendant:
Smith, CEO, Ned Lamont and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Staton v. Lamont
as 23-99
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Terrell Staton
Defendant / Appellee:
Ned Lamont, C/O John Bowen, Lt. Oullette and others
Defendant:
Scanning Program - Robinson
Berka v. Lamont et al
as 3:2022cv01629
Plaintiff:
George Berka
Defendant:
Ned Lamont, William Tong and City Of Middletown
Schlosser v. Lamont et al
as 3:2022cv01620
Petitioner:
Jeffrey Schlosser
Defendant:
William Tong
Respondent:
Ned Lamont
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Severino v. Spagnola et al
as 3:2022cv01529
Plaintiff:
Mr. Dillon Severino and Dillon Severino
Defendant:
Fernando Spagnola, Ned Lamont, James Rovella and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Roundtree-McCrorey v. Coombs Family
as 22-3049
Plaintiff:
McCrorey Family, Andrew McCrorey, Jr., National Dairy Products and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Anjaknie Roundtree-McCrorey
Defendant / Appellee:
Coombs Family, Comb Family, Elizabeth Horton Sheff and others
Roundtree-McCrorey et al v. Coombs Family et al
as 3:2022cv01329
Plaintiff:
Anjaknie Roundtree-McCrorey, McCrorey Family, Andrew McCrorey, Jr and others
Defendant:
Coombs Family, Comb Family, Elizabeth Horton Sheff and others
Clark v. State of Connecticut et al
as 3:2022cv01314
Plaintiff:
Gordon Clark
Defendant:
State of Connecticut, Ned Lamont, William Tong and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Quint v. Lamont et al
as 3:2022cv01263
Plaintiff:
Mr. Richard R. Quint and Richard R. Quint
Defendant:
Lamont, Quiros, Martin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
