Cases 31 - 40 of 46
Newsom v. Johnson et al
as 6:2015cv01545
Plaintiff:
Eugene Newsom
Defendant:
Chief Johnson, Officer Torres and R. Wilbur
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Newsom v. Johnson et al
as 6:2015cv01489
Plaintiff:
Eugene Newsom
Defendant:
Chief Johnson, Officer Torres, L. Singleton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Vaughn v. City Of Chicago Police Department et al
as 1:2015cv03706
Plaintiff:
James R. Vaughn
Defendant:
Steve Rowe and Officer Torres
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ferguson v. Chicago Police Department et al
as 1:2015cv03025
Plaintiff:
Andre Ferguson
Defendant:
Chicago Police Department, Officer Torres, Officer Romero and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Nathaniel Rice v. Daymon Byrd
as 15-6288
Plaintiff - Appellant:
NATHANIEL DANTE RICE
Defendant - Appellee:
DAYMON BYRD, Senior Officer, OFFICER HIGHLANDER, OFFICER QUINN and others
Defendant:
OFFICER JOHN DOE, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, OFFICER SINGLETON and others
Nathaniel Rice v. U.S.
as 13-7444
Plaintiff - Appellant:
NATHANIEL DANTE RICE
Defendant - Appellee:
OFFICER JOHN DOE, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, DAYMON BYRD, Senior Officer and others
Vincent Price McCowan v. B Hedrick et al
as 2:2013cv05969
Defendant:
M B Atchley, Officer A Avalos, Sgt Black and others
Plaintiff:
Vincent Price McCowan
McClinton v. Ms. Pendaruis et al
as 2:2013cv03335
Defendant:
Bohemia Parole Office, Erickson, Parole Officer Mastronardi and others
Plaintiff:
Charles McClinton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Robert Craig Bell v. The City of Los Angeles et al
as 2:2010cv05823
Plaintiff:
Robert Craig Bell
Defendant:
Dennis Derr, The City of Los Angeles and Officer Torres
Pinchas Yehoshua v. City of Los Angeles et al
as 2:2010cv04679
Defendant:
City of Los Angeles and DOES
Badge #37360:
Officer Torres
Badge #37011:
Officer Whtey
Plaintiff:
Pinchas Yehoshua
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
