Cases 31 - 40 of 52
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2023cv01603
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Doe et al v. U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement et al
as 1:2023cv00971
Plaintiff:
Carlos Doe, Luis Doe, Ernesto Doe and others
Defendant:
U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, U.S. Department of Homeland Security, Alejandro Mayorkas and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv03996
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv08440
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1225 Immigration: Enforcement of Administrative Subpoena
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv01323
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv01974
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv01453
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv01511
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (IMMIGRATION)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv23455
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
R.R.M.C. v. U.S. Department of Homeland Security et al
as 1:2023cv07946
Plaintiff:
R.R.M.C.
Defendant:
U.S. Department of Homeland Security, U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
