Cases 31 - 40 of 83
Fittery et al v. Air & Liquid Systems Corporation as successor by merger to Buffalo Pumps, Inc. et al
as 1:2015cv13385
Defendant:
Flowserve US, Inc.,, Foster Wheeler, LLC, Crosby Valve and Gage Company and others
Plaintiff:
Larry R. Fittery and Nancy J. Fittery
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Asbestos Litigation
Cady v. Foster Wheeler LLC
as 1:2015cv11900
Defendant:
Foster Wheeler LLC , Metropolitan Life Insurance Company , General Dynamics Corporation and others
Cross_claimant:
Foster Wheeler LLC , General Electric Company , Nibco, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Michael P Cady and Andrea Cady
Cross_defendant:
General Electric Company , A.W. Chesterton Company, API Heat Transfer Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Tucker et al v. AERCO International, Inc. et al
as 3:2015cv00304
Plaintiff:
Joe Donald Tucker and Cora May Tucker
Defendant:
AERCO International, Inc., All Acquisitions, LLC, Air & Liquid Systems Corp. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Mooneyhan et al v. Plastics Engineering Company et al
as 1:2014cv00176
Plaintiff:
Ronald Mooneyhan and Betty Mooneyhan
Defendant:
Plastics Engineering Company, Cytec Industries, Inc.; Cytec Engineered Materials, Inc., Occidental Chemical Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Birlie Smith v. The Boeing Company
as 14-3007
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Birlie Smith, Individually and as the Surviving Heir of Ronald Smith, Sr., Deceased
Defendant:
3M Company, Boeing Aerospace Operations, Inc., individually and as Successor in Interest to McDonnell Douglas, BP Amoco Chemical Company and others
Defendant - Appellant:
The Boeing Company
Smith v 3 M Company, et al
as 4:2014cv01200
Defendant:
Boeing Aerospace Operations, Inc. , The Boeing Company , BP Amoco Chemical Company and others
Plaintiff:
Birlie Smith
Cross_claimant:
Pneumo Abex, LLC , Brand Insulations Inc. , Georgia-Pacific LLC and others
Cross_defendant:
Pneumo Abex, LLC , BP Amoco Chemical Company , BTL Specialty Resins Corp. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Kieffer-Moseley v. Air & Liquid System Corporation et al
as 3:2013cv01313
Plaintiff:
Delores J Kieffer-Moseley and Delores J Kiefer-Moseley
Defendant:
Air & Liquid System Corporation , Air Products and Chemicals, Inc., Armstrong International Inc and others
Cross_claimant:
Georgia-Pacific Corporation , Industrial Holding Corporation , Ingersoll-Rand Company and others
Cross_defendant:
Georgia-Pacific Corporation , Air & Liquid System Corporation , Air Products and Chemicals, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Fulwider v. AERCO International, Inc. et al
as 3:2013cv01220
Counter Defendant:
Ameron International Corporation, The Dow Chemical Company, Research-Cottrell, Inc. and others
Defendant:
Welco Manufacturing Company, Brand Insulations, Inc., Young Insulation Group of St. Louis, Inc. and others
Cross Claimant:
General Cable Industries, Inc., AERCO International, Inc., Vanderbilt Minerals, LLC and others
Cross Defendant:
Dap, Inc., Ralph Lewis Fulwider, Crane Company and others
Counter Claimant:
Grimes Aerospace Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
Kirschner et al v. AERCO International, Inc. et al
as 3:2013cv01207
Plaintiff:
Edward Kirschner and Eugenia Kirschner
Defendant:
AERCO International, Inc., American National Insurance Company, American Optical Corporation and others
Cross_claimant:
Illinois Tool Works, Inc. , Georgia-Pacific LLC , Ingersoll-Rand Company and others
Cross_defendant:
Illinois Tool Works, Inc. , 3M Company, AERCO International, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Dryfka v. Trane US, Inc. et al
as 3:2013cv01019
Defendant:
Trane US, Inc., CBS Corporation, Core Furnace Systems Corporation and others
Plaintiff:
Candace Dryfka
Cross Defendant:
General Dynamics Corporation and Zurn Industries LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
