Cases 31 - 40 of 158
Ashford v. Myers et al
as 0:2020cv03384
Defendant:
Vivian Elliot, Halford Myers, Yvonne Munro and others
Plaintiff:
Randolph Ashford
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams v. AT&T Corp. et al
as 1:2020cv03175
Defendant:
Quinthian Folk-Ginn, AT&T Corp. and Barnwell Police Department, City of
Plaintiff:
Randolph S. Williams, II
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Non-Motor Vehicle
Assa'ad-Faltas v. Wilson et al
as 3:2020cv02479
Plaintiff:
Marie Assa'ad-Faltas, Dr. Assa and Dr. Faltas
Defendant:
John H. Strom, Dinah Gail Steele, Hugh Ryan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Voltz-Loomis et al v. McMaster et al
as 5:2020cv01533
Petitioner:
Allen Slaughter, Jeanne Voltz-Loomis, Jane Roes 1 through 10 and others
Respondent:
Mollie Dupriest Taylor, Dan Batson, Christopher F Gibbs and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Randolph v. USA
as 2:2020cv00910
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Gena C Randolph
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Young v. 3M Company, The et al
as 2:2020cv00015
Defendant:
Dynax Corporation, Buckeye Fire Equipment Company, Chemours Company, The and others
Plaintiff:
William Randolph Young
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Tinnell v. Monsanto Company
as 2:2019cv02027
Plaintiff:
John Randolph Tinnell
Defendant:
Monsanto Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Camp v. Doe et al
as 4:2019cv01884
Defendant:
John "Rogers" Doe, John "Miller" Doe, Jane "Brown" Doe and others
Plaintiff:
William Coleman Camp
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. Williams
as 6:2019cv01576
Petitioner:
Mykel Johnson
Respondent:
Randolph Williams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Martin v. Department of Social Services et al
as 3:2019cv00806
Plaintiff:
Randolph Martin
Defendant:
Contractor Kershaw County Enforcement, Contractor Janet C. Hasty, Contractor Kershaw County Family Court and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
