Cases 31 - 40 of 248
BPP Illinois, LLC v. The Royal Bank of Scotland
as 15-3706
Plaintiff - Appellant:
BPP Illinois, LLC, BPP Iowa, LLC, BPP Michigan, LLC and others
Defendant - Appellee:
The Royal Bank of Scotland Group PLC, RBS Citizens, N.A. and Citizens Bank of Pennsylvania
BPP Illinois, LLC v. The Royal Bank of Scotland
as 15-3706
Plaintiff / Appellant:
BPP Iowa, LLC, BPP Michigan, LLC, FFC Partnership, L.P. and others
Defendant / Appellee:
The Royal Bank of Scotland Group PLC, Citizens Bank of Pennsylvania and RBS Citizens, N.A.
Stromberg v. OCWEN Loan Servicing, LLC et al
as 5:2015cv04719
Plaintiff:
Bonnie Lynne Stromberg
Defendant:
OCWEN Loan Servicing, LLC , Morgan Stanley Private Bank, N.A. and RBS Citizens, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 15-2003
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Oakley v. RBS Citizens, N.A.
as 2:2015cv12441
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Oakley
Defendant:
RBS Citizens, N.A. and Trott & Trott, P.C.
Cause Of Action: 23 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv00486
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv12301
Debtor:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1334
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv12361
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Debtor:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1334
Lento v. RBS Citizens, N.A., et al
as 15-1489
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WILLIAM LENTO
Defendant - Appellee:
RBS CITIZENS, N.A. and KENNETH COTE
Defendant:
CITIZENS BANK, CITIZENS BANK OF MASSACHUSETTS and CHARTER ONE BANK
In Re Application for Order Enforcing a Subpoena
as 1:2015mc91096
Plaintiff:
Linda Sanders
Defendant:
RBS Citizens, N.A.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
