Cases 31 - 40 of 42
Jimmy Magee v. Robert Crowe, et al
as 10-30508
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JIMMY W. MAGEE
Defendant - Appellee:
ROBERT CROWE, Sheriff, individually and in his official capacity and DEMILLE TOPPS, Warden
Stewart v. Galloway et al
as 2:2010cv00037
Plaintiff:
Karven Tiawan Stewart
Defendant:
James Galloway, Jennifer E. Lewis, Tommy Gregory and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2009cv07735
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
James v. Jones et al
as 2:2009cv03681
Plaintiff:
Malcolm Andrew James
Defendant:
Aubrey Jones, Robert Crowe, Washington Parish Sheriff's Office and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Barnes v. Crowe et al
as 2:2009cv03352
Plaintiff:
Kelly LeRay Barnes
Defendant:
Robert Crowe, Demille Topps, Kim Brumfield and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Magee v. Crowe et al
as 2:2009cv03142
Plaintiff:
Felton Magee
Defendant:
Robert Crowe, Warden Topps, Warden Cummings and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Ellis v. Crowe et al
as 2:2009cv03061
Plaintiff:
Jerry Ellis
Defendant:
Robert Crowe, Demille Topps, Wallace Cummings and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Magee v. Crowe et al
as 2:2009cv00167
Plaintiff:
Jimmy W. Magee
Defendant:
Robert Crowe and D. Topps
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Johnson v. Department of Public Safety And Corrections et al
as 2:2009cv00120
Plaintiff:
Roderick Earl Johnson
Defendant:
Department of Public Safety And Corrections, Robert Crowe, Demille Topps and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Jackson v. Brumfield et al
as 2:2008cv05085
Plaintiff:
Rakheem Jarius Jackson
Defendant:
Kim Brumfield, Monica Barber, Demille Topps and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
