Cases 31 - 40 of 80
HILL v. W.H.H. TRICE AND COMPANY
as 1:2014cv00144
Plaintiff:
ERIC RODNEY HILL
Defendant:
W.H.H. TRICE AND COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HILL v. COLVIN
as 3:2013cv00195
Plaintiff:
RODNEY HILL
Defendant:
CAROLYN W. COLVIN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Lamb v. Telle et al
as 5:2012cv00070
Plaintiff:
Zachary Amos Lamb
Defendant:
Jack M. Telle, Phil Hazel , Rodney Hill and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HILL v. REAL ESTATE, et al
as 1:2012cv00673
Plaintiff:
ERIC RODNEY HILL
Defendant:
W. H. H. TRICE AND COMPANY, REAL ESTATE, SALES CONSTRUCTION and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
United States of America v. Edwards (Brown)
as 12-1759
Appellee USA:
United States of America
Defendant:
Cory Edwards, AKA Wiggles, AKA Sealed Defendant 1, Charles Myles, AKA Bossman, AKA Sealed Defendant 2, Antonio Owens, AKA O'Head, AKA Sealed Defendant 3 and others
Defendant - Appellant:
Karo Brown, AKA Kike, AKA Kite, AKA Sealed Defendant 4
United States of America v. Edward
as 11-5138
Appellee USA:
United States of America
Defendant:
Charles Myles, AKA Sealed Defendant #1, AKA Sealed Defendant 2, Antonio Owens, Karo Brown, AKA Kike, AKA Kite, AKA Sealed Defendant 4 and others
Defendant - Appellant:
Waliek Betts, AKA Leek, AKA Sealed Defendant 6
United States of America v. Hill
as 11-4790
Appellee USA:
United States of America
Defendant:
Tyrone Pennick, AKA Stuff, David Manuel, AKA Day Day, Wardell Epps, AKA Whoa Whoa and others
Defendant - Appellant:
Rodney Hill, AKA Rock
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 11-4361
Petitioner - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv00772
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
HILL v. MIDDLEBROOKS
as 1:2010cv00329
Petitioner:
ERIC RODNEY HILL
Respondent:
SCOTT A. MIDDLEBROOKS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
